Cited by 323Language Development and DisordersHearing Impairment and CommunicationNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

What you hear and what you say: language performance in Spanish–English bilinguals

Open access
Bohman, Thomas M., Bedore, Lisa M., Peña, Elizabeth D., Mendez-Perez, Anita, Gillam, Ronald B.·2010·International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assesses the factors that contribute to Spanish and English language development in bilingual children. METHOD: 757 Hispanic Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten age children completed screening tests of semantic and morphosyntactic development in Spanish and English. Parents provided information about their occupation and education as well as their children's English and Spanish exposure. Data were analyzed using zero-inflated regression models (comprising a logistic regression component and a negative binomial or Poisson component) to explore factors that contributed to children initiating L1 and L2 performance and factors that contributed to building children's knowledge. RESULTS: Factors that were positively associated with initiating L1 and L2 performance were language input/output, free and reduced lunch, and age. Factors associated with building knowledge included age, parent education, input/output, free and reduced lunch and school district. CONCLUSION: Amount of language input is important as children begin to use a language, and amount of language output is important for adding knowledge to their language. Semantic development seemed to be driven more by input while morphosyntax development relied on both input and output. Clinicians who assess bilingual children should examine children's language output in their second language to better understand their levels of performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13670050903342019

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results contradict the consistent evidence of a positive connection between SES and L2 proficiency in bilingual learners.

    “These results contradict the consistent evidence of a positive connection between SES and L2 proficiency in bilingual learners (e.g., Bohman et al., 2010; Cobo-Lewis et al., 2002a; Golberg et al., 2008; Oller et al., 2007).”

    From Linguistic interdependence of receptive vocabulary skills in emergent bilingual preschool children: Exploring a factor-dependent approach (2019) · cites this paper as Bohman et al., 2010

    The Discussion (‘Adding to Language Knowledge’; page unavailable) links higher maternal education to higher English scores, supporting a positive SES–L2 association in these children. But the paper says SES has not been consistently or systematically explored in second-language outcomes, and its Discussion (‘Gaining Traction in a Language’; page unavailable) reports a better Spanish outcome among lower-SES children. It therefore does not support describing the evidence as consistently positive across bilingual learners. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Greater input of a given language is associated with more advanced language outcomes in bilingual children.

    “Findings consistently indicate that more advanced language outcomes are often associated with greater input of a given language (e.g., Bedore et al., 2012; Bohman et al., 2010; Jia and Fuse, 2007; Paradis, 2023, among others).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Oller DK Pearson BZ 2002 Assessing the effects of bilingualism: A background Language and Literacy in Bilingual Children 3 21 Clevedon Multilingual Matters

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohman, T. M., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Mendez-Perez, A., & Gillam, R. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bohman, Thomas M.
Venue
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Published
2010-05
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
325-344
ISSN
  • 1367-0050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7522
OpenAlex
W2090093550
Cited by
323
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC007439)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
Spanish-English bilingualism, bilingual children, language development, semantic development, morphosyntactic development, language input, language output, second language acquisition, parent education, free and reduced-price meals, bilingual language assessment, zero-inflated regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review