Cited by 14Language Development and DisordersDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Two Grammatical Tasks for Screening Language Abilities in Spanish-Speaking Children

Auza Benavides, Alejandra, Kapantzoglou, Maria, Murata, Chiharu·2018·American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Abstract

Purpose: This study assessed concurrent validity evidence for 2 grammatical tasks of a new screener, the Tamiz de Problemas de Lenguaje, for identifying monolingual Spanish-speaking children at risk for specific language impairment with grammatical deficits. Method: A total of 770 4- to 6-year-old monolingual, Spanish-speaking children with and without language impairment were sampled from 3 different states in Mexico. Multiple logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to assess the predictive utility of the model and the classification accuracy of the tasks. The criterion was diagnosis of specific language impairment with grammatical deficits on the basis of a comprehensive language assessment. Results: Results indicated that sensitivity estimates ranged from .90 to .94 and specificity estimates from .83 to .92. Overall, there was a good balance between sensitivity and specificity estimates with moderate to large positive and negative likelihood ratios. Conclusion: Results suggested that the 2 grammatical tasks are suitable for identifying 4- to 6-year-old monolingual Spanish-speaking children at risk for grammatical deficits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2017_ajslp-17-0052

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auza Benavides, A., Kapantzoglou, M., & Murata, C.
Affiliations
  • Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Instituto Mexicano para la Atención del Desarrollo del Niño (IMAD), Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico
  • Portland State University (US)
  • Instituto Nacional de Pediatria (MX)
Venue
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2018-05-03
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
690-705
ISSN
  • 1058-0360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9110
OpenAlex
W2792805677
Cited by
14
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
specific language impairment, grammatical deficits, language screening, early childhood language assessment, concurrent validity, sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios, risk identification
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Child Behavior, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language Development Disorders, Language Tests, Male, Mexico, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review