Cited by 99CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalysts for Methane ReformingCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Effect of cationic and anionic solid polymer electrolyte on direct electrochemical reduction of gaseous CO2 to fuel

Aeshala, L.M., Uppaluri, R.G., Verma, A.·2013·Journal of CO2 Utilization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcou.2013.09.004

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aeshala, L. M., Uppaluri, R. G., & Verma, A.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
Corresponding author
Verma, A.
Venue
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
3-4
Pages
49-55
ISSN
2212-9820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070507728
Cited by
99
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of CO2 Utilization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
electrochemical CO2 reduction, gaseous CO2, solid polymer electrolytes, anion exchange membranes, cathode materials, methane production, ethylene production, methanol synthesis, Faradaic efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review