Cited by 9Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring variation in factors associated with increased likelihood of pretrial detention

Cadoff, Becca, Wolff, Kevin T., Chauhan, Preeti·2021·Journal of Criminal Justice

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101799

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Albonetti, 1991, An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion, Social Problems, 38, 247, 10.2307/800532 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barron, 2018, New York’s red borough, City Journal, 315
  3. Bushway, 2007, The inextricable link between age and criminal history in sentencing, Crime & Delinquency, 53, 156, 10.1177/0011128706294444 · DOI
  4. Chapman, 2019, New York City jail costs reach record level, The Wall Street Journal
  5. Church, 1978, Justice delayed: The pace of litigation in urban trial courts, State Court Journal, 2, 3
  6. Clifford, 2014, Brooklyn prosecutor limits when he’ll target marijuana, The New York Times, 17
  7. Comfort, 2016, “A twenty-hour a day job”: The impact of frequent low-level criminal justice involvement on family life, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 665, 63, 10.1177/0002716215625038 · DOI
  8. Csete, 2010, Consequences of injustice: Pre-trial detention and health, International Journal of Prisoner Health, 6, 3
  9. Daly, 1989, Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions, Crime & Delinquency, 35, 136, 10.1177/0011128789035001007 · DOI
  10. Davis, 2000, The American prosecutor: Independence, power, and the threat of tyranny, Iowa Law Review, 86, 393
  11. Demuth, 2003, Racial and Ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, black, and white felony arrestees, Criminology, 41, 873, 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01007.x · DOI
  12. Demuth, 2004, The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process, Social Problems, 51, 222, 10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.222 · DOI
  13. Dunn, 2018, Bail reform, preventive detention, and “the police state”, The New York Law Journal
  14. Field, 1992, The effect of temperature on crime, British Journal of Criminology, 32, 340, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048222 · DOI
  15. Frazier, 1980, Pretrial release and bail decisions, Criminology, 18, 162, 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1980.tb01357.x · DOI
  16. Freiburger, 2010, The impact of race, gender, and age on the pretrial decision, Criminal Justice Review, 35, 318, 10.1177/0734016809360332 · DOI
  17. Freiburger, 2010, The impact of race on the pretrial decision, American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 76, 10.1007/s12103-009-9069-z · DOI
  18. Fried, 2019, Richard A. Brown, Queens District attorney, dies at 86, The New York Times, 25
  19. Goldkamp, 1985, Danger and detention: A second generation of bail reform, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1, 1, 10.2307/1143353 · DOI
  20. Goldkamp, 1979, Bail decision making and pretrial detention: Surfacing judicial policy, Law and Human Behavior, 3, 227, 10.1007/BF01039804 · DOI
  21. Gouldin, 2016, Disentangling flight risk from dangerousness, Brigham Young University Law Review, 3, 837
  22. Goulette, 2015, From initial appearance to sentencing: Do female defendants experience disparate treatment?, Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 406, 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.07.003 · DOI
  23. Hartley, 2007, Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective—a research note, Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4
  24. Hissong, 2017, The role of private legal representation and the implicit effect of defendants’ demographic characteristics in setting bail and obtaining pretrial release, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30, 708, 10.1177/0887403417714560 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Holmes, 1996, Ethnicity, legal resources, and felony dispositions in two southwestern jurisdictions, Justice Quarterly, 13, 11, 10.1080/07418829600092801 · DOI
  26. Hood, 2019, Bail and Pretrial detention: Contours and causes of temporal and county variation, The Russel Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5, 126
  27. Johnson, 2006, The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge-and county-level influences, Criminology, 44, 259, 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00049.x · DOI
  28. Katz, 1995, The effect of race and gender on bail outcomes: A test of an interactive model, American Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 161, 10.1007/BF02885913 · DOI
  29. Kim, 2018, Unpacking pretrial detention: An examination of patterns and predictors of readmissions, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29, 663, 10.1177/0887403418760372 · DOI
  30. Krivo, 1996, Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime, Social Forces, 75, 619, 10.2307/2580416 · DOI
  31. Kutateladze, 2014, Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing, Criminology, 52, 514, 10.1111/1745-9125.12047 · DOI
  32. Lee, 2019, To detain or not to detain? Using propensity scores to examine the relationship between pretrial detention and conviction, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30, 128, 10.1177/0887403416668016 · DOI
  33. Leslie, 2017, The unintended impact of pretrial detention on case outcomes: Evidence from new York City arraignments, The Journal of Law and Economics, 60, 529, 10.1086/695285 · DOI
  34. Martinez, 2019, Time, money, and punishment: Institutional racial-ethnic inequalities in pretrial detention and case outcomes, Crime & Delinquency
  35. Medina, 2019, The progressive prosecutors blazing a new path for the US justice system, The Guardian
  36. Melilli, 1992, Prosecutorial discretion in an adversary system, BYU L. Rev., 669
  37. Mukaka, 2012, A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research, Malawi Medical Journal, 24, 69
  38. Nagel, 1983, The legal/extra-legal controversy: Judicial decisions in pretrial release, Law and Society Review, 17, 481, 10.2307/3053590 · DOI
  39. Noe-Bustamante, 2020, About one-in-four U.S. Hispanics have heard of Latinx but just 3% use it, Pew Research Center
  40. 2017, 2016 annual report.
  41. Oleson, 2016, The effect of pretrial detention on sentencing in two federal districts, Justice Quarterly, 33, 1103, 10.1080/07418825.2014.959035 · DOI
  42. Ostrom, 2005, Court cultures and their consequences, The Court Manager, 20, 14
  43. Ottone, 2018, Pretrial detention and the decision to impose bail in Southern California, Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 19, 24
  44. Pinchevsky, 2016, Sex-based disparities in pretrial release decisions and outcomes, Crime and Delinquency, 62, 308, 10.1177/0011128713482415 · DOI
  45. Ranson, 2014, Crime, weather, and climate change, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 67, 274, 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.11.008 · DOI
  46. Reitler, 2013, The effects of legal and extralegal factors on detention decisions in US District Courts, Justice Quarterly, 30, 340, 10.1080/07418825.2012.668925 · DOI
  47. Roth, 2017, The culture of misdemeanor courts, Hofstra Law Review, 46, 215
  48. Rubenstein, 2019, Staten Island’s culture of grievance boils over, again, Politico
  49. Sacks, 2012, Bail and sentencing: Does pretrial detention lead to harsher punishment?, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 59, 10.1177/0887403412461501 · DOI
  50. Sacks, 2015, Sentenced to pretrial detention: A study of bail decisions and outcomes, American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 661, 10.1007/s12103-014-9268-0 · DOI
  51. Sampson, 1993, Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime, Criminology, 31, 301, 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01132.x · DOI
  52. Sampson, 1997, Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States, Crime and Justice, 21, 311, 10.1086/449253 · DOI
  53. Sampson, 1997, Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy, Science, 277, 918, 10.1126/science.277.5328.918 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Schaefer, 2019, Examining judicial pretrial release decisions: The influence of risk assessments and race, Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law Society, 20, 47
  55. Schlesinger, 2005, Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing, Justice Quarterly, 22, 170, 10.1080/07418820500088929 · DOI
  56. Spohn, 2009, Race, sex, and pretrial detention in federal court: Indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage, University of Kansas Law Review, 57, 879
  57. St. Louis, 2019, Neighborhood context and the pretrial process: Do defendants face adverse outcomes due to their home address?, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31, 1340, 10.1177/0887403419890124 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Steffensmeier, 1993, Gender and imprisonment decisions, Criminology, 31, 411, 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01136.x · DOI
  59. Steffensmeier, 1998, The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male, Criminology, 36, 763, 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x · DOI · Paper page
  60. Ulmer, 2012, Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research, Justice Quarterly, 29, 1, 10.1080/07418825.2011.624115 · DOI
  61. Vorenberg, 1981, Decent restraint of prosecutorial power, Harvard Law Review, 1521, 10.2307/1340665 · DOI
  62. Williams, 2003, The effect of pretrial detention on imprisonment decisions, Criminal Justice Review, 28, 299, 10.1177/073401680302800206 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Williams, 2009, Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups, Sociological Methods & Research, 37, 531, 10.1177/0049124109335735 · DOI
  64. Williams, 2010, Fitting heterogeneous choice models with oglm, The Stata Journal, 10, 540, 10.1177/1536867X1101000402 · DOI
  65. Wooldredge, 2012, Distinguishing race effects on pre-trial release and sentencing decisions, Justice Quarterly, 29, 41, 10.1080/07418825.2011.559480 · DOI
  66. Wooldredge, 2017, Ecological contributors to disparities in bond amounts and pretrial detention, Crime & Delinquency, 63, 1682, 10.1177/0011128716659636 · DOI
  67. Wooldredge, 2015, Is the impact of cumulative disadvantage on sentencing greater for black defendants?, Criminology and Public Policy, 14, 187, 10.1111/1745-9133.12124 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cadoff, B., Wolff, K. T., & Chauhan, P.
Affiliations
John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
Corresponding author
Cadoff, Becca
Venue
Journal of Criminal Justice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
74
Pages
101799
ISSN
0047-2352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3170763779
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Arnold Ventures LLC
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
pretrial detention, crime types, racial disparities, jurisdictional variation, New York City boroughs, criminal justice decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review