Cited by 8Research Data Management PracticesAcademic Publishing and Open AccessMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Data sharing and transparency indicators in published RCTs in Oral Health between 2017 and 2023

Open access
Mikelis, Filippos, Karamalaki, Dimitra, Mikeli, Aikaterini, Tzanetakis, Giorgos N., Koletsi, Despina·2024·Journal of Dentistry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To record the proportion of data sharing reporting in terms of primary data and/or statistical code of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), published across 12 high impact journals in Dentistry, covering 6 specialty domains. Associations with certain journal, publication and outcome characteristics were examined. Transparency indicators such as registration or funding statements were assessed. METHODS: We identified and included all RCTs published from January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2023 in journals of high impact of the following domains: Periodontology, Endodontics, Restorative Dentistry/Prosthodontics, Orthodontics, Pediatric Dentistry, Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of RCTs reporting their intent to share or openly shared primary data and we tested for associations with potential predictors. Funding, registration, and statistical code/script sharing practices were also examined. RESULTS: A total of 752 RCTs were included, of which only 119 (15.8%) either openly provided their data or included a statement of intention to share upon request. Only one study openly provided the statistical code underlying the analysis used. RCTs in periodontology more frequently included statements about positive intent to share (57/210;27.1%), followed by Orthodontics (35/157;22.3%). Significant effects of year, dentistry domain and continent of authorship on data sharing practices were identified (p < 0.001 in all cases). There was evidence that registered RCTs had 2.04 times higher odds for intention to share data (95%confidence interval: 1.06, 3.92;p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in oral health RCTs, empirical evidence suggested very low prevalence of positive data sharing practices. Enhancing transparency is pivotal in promoting reproducibility and credibility of research findings. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of this empirical report bring attention to key transparency indicators in randomized controlled trials. These largely impact on the credibility and reproducibility of the evidence base for clinical decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105263

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies on this topic focused their assessments on specific dental specialties, such as pediatric dentistry, or on specific transparency practices, such as data and code sharing.

    “Previous studies on this topic focused their assessments on specific dental specialties, such as pediatric dentistry [25], or on specific transparency practices, such as data and code sharing [26].”
  • Data and code sharing has been the least reported aspect in many studies.

    “and data and code sharing has been the least reported aspect in many studies [25–30, 41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mikelis, F., Karamalaki, D., Mikeli, A., Tzanetakis, G. N., & Koletsi, D.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Koletsi, Despina
Venue
Journal of Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
149
Pages
105263
ISSN
0300-5712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400871283
Cited by
8
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dentistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
data sharing, research transparency, randomized controlled trials, oral health research, clinical trial registration, research funding disclosure, reproducibility, periodontics, endodontics, restorative dentistry, orthodontics, pediatric dentistry, maxillofacial surgery
MeSH terms
Dentistry, Humans, Oral Health, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dental Research, Information Dissemination, Journal Impact Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review