Cited by 15Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Publishing and Open AccessPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Trial registration and selective outcome reporting in Endodontic Research: Evidence over a 5‐year period

Open access
Tzanetakis, Giorgos N., Koletsi, Despina·2021·International Endodontic Journal

Abstract

Aim To assess the prevalence of registration of clinical trials in endodontic research and to identify outcome reporting discrepancies between trial registration entries and respective final publications. Associations with publication characteristics, such as journal, year of publication, origin, number of centres and authors, funding and statistical significance of the findings, were also sought. Methodology All reports of endodontic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in 4 endodontic specialty and 4 general dental journals from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020 were identified. Trial registration frequency patterns were assessed for the included RCTs, whilst for the ones registered, outcome reporting discrepancies were recorded. Article characteristics such as year of publication, geographic region, number of centres, authors participating in the publication, funding, type of registration and others were identified. Descriptive statistics and univariable/multivariable logistic regression were performed to examine the effect of study characteristics on identified registration practices. Results One hundred and fifty-five RCTs were included, with the majority published in specialty journals (121/155; 78.1%). A total of 42.6% of the identified RCTs was registered (66/155), mostly retrospectively (38/66; 57.6%). There was strong evidence that each additional year for more recent publication accounted for 1.42 times higher odds of being registered (adjusted Odds Ratio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/iej.13573

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in specific dental areas such as endodontics, orthodontics, and implantology found high rates of SOR.

    “studies in specific dental areas such as endodontics, orthodontics, and implantology found high rates of SOR (Koufatzidou et al. 2019; Sendyk et al. 2019; Tzanetakis and Koletsi 2021)”

    From Nonpublication and Selective Outcome Reporting of Oral Health Trials (2023) · cites this paper as Tzanetakis and Koletsi 2021

  • This rate is consistent with SOR rates in endodontics (36.4%), implantology (55%), and orthodontics (47%).

    “This rate is consistent with SOR rates in endodontics (36.4%) (Tzanetakis and Koletsi 2021), implantology (55%) (Sendyk et al. 2019), and orthodontics (47%) (Koufatzidou et al. 2019).”

    From Nonpublication and Selective Outcome Reporting of Oral Health Trials (2023) · cites this paper as Tzanetakis and Koletsi 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tzanetakis, G. N., & Koletsi, D.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Tzanetakis, Giorgos N.
Venue
International Endodontic Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-07-09
Volume
54
Issue
10
Pages
1794-1803
ISSN
  • 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2591
OpenAlex
W3160714445
Cited by
15
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Endodontic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
clinical trial registration, selective outcome reporting, endodontic research, randomized controlled trials, registration practice, research transparency, publication year, retrospective registration, primary and secondary outcomes
MeSH terms
Endodontics, Registries, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review