Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 269 of the 269 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 capture at different pressures

Open access
Mahajan, Shreya, Lahtinen, Manu·2022·Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

Abstract

Global climate change ensued by the rise in atmospheric CO2 levels is one of the greatest challenges our planet is facing today. This worldwide distress demands technologies that can contribute to our society toward “negative carbon emissions”. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies are in important role for capturing CO2 from existing emission sources, such as industrial and energy production point sources, before new more prominent modifications to the energy infrastructure can be implemented. Recently, alongside point source capture, direct air capture (DAC) processes have emerged as highly sought-after technologies that are able to capture CO2 from the ambient air. Alongside the traditional inorganic adsorbents, a new class of solid porous adsorbents, called as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged in recent years also, as a group of potentially very efficient materials to capture CO2. The promising results of MOF-based adsorbents have already achieved great interest and have contributed to their ever-accelerating research to develop new and even better adsorbents for both point source and DAC recovery technologies. This review highlights the research that has been focused on utilizing MOFs in the carbon capture processes, particularly targeting materials applicable to low CO2 partial pressures but also capturing processes in pure CO2 (1 bar) will be reviewed, because it is a widely used test condition for characterizing sorption properties of MOF adsorbents. Herein, we outline four major approaches, through which the CO2 adsorption capacity and selectivity can be boosted, including targeted modifications of the metal centers, pore size control, proper selection and substitution of linker units, and functionalization of MOFs by amines. The mechanisms of the sorption event are also reviewed from the perspective of both physisorption and chemisorption phenomena. At the end of the review, we briefly examine the variables related to the coordination of technical-economical, process-technical, and physicochemical properties of adsorbents, which both researchers and engineers should consider when developing new adsorbents and recovery processes, with emphasis on material processing, capture capacity, selectivity, regeneration cyclicity, and cost.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108930

Cites

269 of 269 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 269 references

Metadata

Authors
Mahajan, S., & Lahtinen, M.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
108930
ISSN
  • 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-3437
OpenAlex
W4308308365
Cited by
282
References
269
FWCI
16.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 capture at different pressures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108930
The paper
Mahajan, S., & Lahtinen, M. (2022). Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 capture at different pressures. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108930

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.