Cited by 128Climate Change Policy and EconomicsAgricultural Economics and PolicyEU Law and Policy Analysis

Procrastinating reform: The impact of the market stability reserve on the EU ETS

Perino, Grischa, Willner, Maximilian·2016·Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.006

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fixed long-run cap gives rise to the waterbed effect, whereby any policy overlapping an ETS with a fixed cap only shifts allowance use in time and space but does not increase stringency.

    “The fixed long-run cap gives rise to the waterbed effect, the phenomenon whereby any policy overlapping an ETS with a fixed cap only shifts allowance use in time and space but does not increase stringency.”

    From The Market Stability Reserve in the EU Emissions Trading System: A Critical Review (2023) · cites this paper as Perino & Willner (2016)

  • Because of its long-term cap-neutrality, the 2015 MSR only affects price and emission paths in the short and long run when its interventions make the original path of abatement infeasible due to artificially induced temporary scarcity, i.e., a binding borrowing constraint.

    “Perino & Willner (2016) show that, because of its long-term cap-neutrality, the 2015 MSR only affects price and emission paths both in the short and long run when its interventions make the original path of abatement infeasible due to artificially induced temporary scarcity (i.e., firms would like to borrow allowances from the future but cannot due to a binding borrowing constraint).”

    From The Market Stability Reserve in the EU Emissions Trading System: A Critical Review (2023) · cites this paper as Perino & Willner (2016)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perino, G., & Willner, M.
Affiliations
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Perino, Grischa
Venue
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
80
Pages
37-52
ISSN
0095-0696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2521955382
Cited by
128
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
18.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Konrad-Adenauer-Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
Keywords
Market Stability Reserve, EU Emissions Trading System, carbon pricing, carbon allowances, price fluctuations, policy reform, climate policy design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review