The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motivating green public procurement in China: An individual level perspective
Abstract
Green public procurement (GPP) practices have been recognized as an effective policy tool for sustainable production and consumption. However, GPP practices adoption, especially in developing countries, is still an issue. Seeking to help understand these adoption issues, we develop a conceptual model which hypothesizes moderation effects of GPP knowledge on the relationships between GPP drivers and practices. Using primary data collected from 193 Chinese government officials, we find that regulations, rewards & incentive gains, and stakeholders exert pressure to motivate adoption of GPP practices. Knowledge of GPP regulations, responsibilities and experiences in developed countries is found to be limited. The study also found that voluntary regulations may actually be demotivating GPP practices. This study contributes to further theoretical and practical understanding of GPP practices. The findings can be helpful for policy makers, especially those in developing countries, to establish promotion and diffusion mechanisms for GPP practices as an important sustainable development tool.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rewards and incentives can also have a positive impact on the implementation of GPP (Zhu et al., 2013).”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“Rewards and incentives Zhu et al. (2013)”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Zhu et al. (2013)
Citations
Cites
From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management
Seuring, S. A., & Müller, M. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 · Cited by 6,982
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207540701440345 · Cited by 1,235
Self-citationTowards a national circular economy indicator system in China: an evaluation and critical analysis
Geng, Y., Fu, J., Sarkis, J., & Xue, B. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.005 · Cited by 919
Self-citationJaccard, J. J., Wan, C. K., & Turrisi, R. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2504_4 · Cited by 750
Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study
Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111119551 · Cited by 731
Environmental purchasing: a framework for theory development
Zsidisin, G. A., & Siferd, S. P. (2001) · European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management · doi:10.1016/s0969-7012(00)00007-1 · Cited by 708
Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes
McCrudden, C. (2004) · Natural Resources Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00099.x · Cited by 609
Schaltegger, S., & Synnestvedt, T. (2002) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1006/jema.2002.0555 · Cited by 607
Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector
Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2009) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598540910941993 · Cited by 603
Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation
Carter, C. R., Kale, R., & Grimm, C. M. (2000) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/s1366-5545(99)00034-4 · Cited by 590
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kusahara, 1999, Procurement of telecommunications equipment based on environmental considerations – development of “green procurement”, Ntt Rev., 11, 48
- Sarkis, 2011, Winds of change: corporate social responsibility in China, Ivey Business J., 75, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–216 of 216
Green Supply Chain Management at Permata Pratama Clinic Family
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Manajemen, F. E., & Adisthi*, P. Y. (2026) · Current Science Research Bulletin · doi:10.55677/csrb/03-v03i02y2026
Navigating the Path to Low-Carbon Procurement: Insights from Norwegian Municipalities
Ervik, J. B., & Mwesiumo, D. E. (2026) · doi:10.23865/cdf.264.ch4
Evaluating Khi Thai’s Public Procurement Model for Sustainable Public Procurement
Langseth, M., de Boer, L., & Moe, H. T. (2026) · doi:10.23865/cdf.264.ch1
Gearing sustainable construction in Lebanon : role of inferential stakeholders
Fenianos, O. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/9d456b54z542dz4150zaa24z329883900e3f
Tetteh, F. K., Kwateng, K. O., & Manu, D. (2026) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.70092
Examining the Drivers and Barriers of Green Public Procurement in the State of Idaho, US
Kubi, L. L. (2026) · Contributions to management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16570-1_17
Shavab, F. A., & Tanjung, A. (2026) · JURNAL MINDS Manajemen Ide dan Inspirasi · doi:10.24252/minds.v13i1.61292
How does delegation affect the administrative capacity of the hollow state?
Balbach, T. (2026) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.23326.1
The Effects of Haze Pollution on County-level Entrepreneurship Activity in China
Zhang, X., Li, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-45379-3
Nachhaltige Beschaffung im öffentlichen Sektor
Eßig, M., Kozuch, A., & Glas, A. H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-71282-5_29-1
Azanlerigu, J. A., Muntaka, A. S., Adda, G., Manso, J. F., Kwasi, K. N., & Ofori, I. (2026) · African Journal Of Applied Research · doi:10.26437/h07rfk43
Unpacking public procurement transparency through mediating and moderating mechanisms
Asaduzzaman, M., Hossain, M. T., Nabila, S. T., Raiyan, N., & Afrin, S. S. (2026) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-11-2025-0149
Investigating ISO 14001 for developing green supply chain performance
Sidhu, R. (2015) · Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Sarkis, J.
- Affiliations
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Clark University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Geng, Yong
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 126
- Pages
- 85-95
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006811003
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 23.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (71025002)
- National Key Basic Research Program of China (2011CB013406)
- Natural Science Foundation of China (71033004, 712111042)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (2008-318)
- Ministry of Science and Technology (2011BAJ06B01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Keywords
- green public procurement, government officials, voluntary regulation, regulatory pressure, rewards and incentives, stakeholder pressure, sustainable consumption and production, China, developing countries
- MeSH terms
- China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Government, Individuality, Models, Psychological, Models, Theoretical, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review