Cited by 603Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector

Walker, Helen, Brammer, Stephen·2009·Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate sustainable procurement in the UK public sector. Design/methodology/approach: Sustainable procurement is investigated using a questionnaire that draws on established scales for “purchasing social responsibility”. The survey was administered across the UK public sector, and 106 responses were received from procurement officers. Findings: Analysis of quantitative and qualitative survey data reveal there is significant variation across public sector agencies in the nature of sustainable procurement practice. Local authorities have a particularly strong emphasis on buying from local and small suppliers relative to other sectors, health looks generally lower in many categories, and education appears to have something of an emphasis on environmental aspects of sustainable procurement. Cost has been found to be the leading barrier to sustainable procurement, and top management support the leading facilitator. Research limitations/implications: There is likely to be selection bias in the sample, with those practitioners engaging in the sustainability agenda being more likely to have responded to the questionnaire. The United Kingdom government has an objective amongst the leaders in Europe on sustainable procurement by 2009, and early signs are encouraging that progress towards this goal is underway. Originality/value: This paper provides the first survey of sustainable procurement practices across the UK public sector. It also provides a conceptual framework of influences upon the propensity to engage in sustainable procurement practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13598540910941993

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, H., & Brammer, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Venue
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2009-03-13
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
128-137
ISSN
1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972888608
Cited by
603
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
FWCI
49.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supply Chain Management An International Journal (publishedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
sustainable procurement, public procurement, local government, health sector, education sector, environmental procurement, cost barriers, top management support, procurement officers, United Kingdom public sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review