Cited by 146Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Foxhole atheism, revisited: The effects of mortality salience on explicit and implicit religious belief

Jong, Jonathan, Halberstadt, Jamin, Bluemke, Matthias·2012·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.005

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jong, J., Halberstadt, J., & Bluemke, M.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Jong, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
983-989
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067904728
Cited by
146
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
mortality salience, fear of death, religious beliefs, religious commitment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review