Cited by 164Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: Negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated

Open access
Kuppens, Toon, Spears, Russell, Manstead, Antony S.R., Spruyt, Bram, Easterbrook, Matthew J.·2018·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.001

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Underrepresentation of some groups in elite institutions further undermines those students' social identities because people tend to believe that education is meritocratic and that those who attend elite institutions get there by virtue of their intelligence and motivation.

    “The underrepresentation of some groups of students in elite institutions further undermines those students' social identities because people tend to believe that education is meritocratic and that those who attend elite institutions get there by virtue of their intelligence and motivation (Kuppens, Spears, Manstead, Spruyt, & Easterbrook, 2017;Warikoo & Fuhr, 2014).”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Kuppens, Spears, Manstead, Spruyt, & Easterbrook, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuppens, T., Spears, R., Manstead, A. S. R., Spruyt, B., & Easterbrook, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Kuppens, Toon
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
76
Pages
429-447
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768031381
Cited by
164
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
meritocracy beliefs, social inequality, attribution of responsibility, culpability, ideology, in-group favoritism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review