Cited by 84Bone Tissue Engineering Materials3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Synthesis and incorporation of rod-like nano-hydroxyapatite into type I collagen matrix: a hybrid formulation for 3D printing of bone scaffolds

Open access
Montalbano, Giorgia, Molino, Giulia, Fiorilli, Sonia, Vitale-Brovarone, Chiara·2020·Journal of the European Ceramic Society

Abstract

Over the recent years, nanometric hydroxyapatite (HA) has gained interest as constituent of hybrid systems for bone scaffold fabrication, due to its biomimicry and biocompatibility. In this study, rod-like nano-HA particles were introduced in a type I collagen matrix to create a composite mimicking the bone composition. HA nano-rods (40−60 nm × 20 nm) were synthesised by hydrothermal method involving the use of an ammonium-based dispersing agent (Darvan 821-A) and fully characterised. The homogeneous dispersion of HA nanoparticles throughout the final hybrid formulation was achieved through their suspension in a collagen solution in presence of Darvan 821-A. The resulting homogeneous collagen/nano-HA suspension proved to be suitable for extrusion printing applications, showing shear thinning and sol-gel transition upon simil-physiological conditions. Furthermore, mesh-like structures were printed in a gelatine-supporting bath by means of a commercial bioprinter further demonstrating the potential of the designed hybrid system for the fabrication of 3D bone-like scaffolds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.02.018

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A biomimetic nano-HA/collagen scaffold (65 wt.% and 35 wt.%) showed natural bone architecture that facilitates adhesion, proliferation and differentiation.

    “Biomimietic scaffold showed natural bone architecture which facilitates adhesion, proliferation and differentiation.[108]”

    From Nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen composite as scaffold material for bone regeneration. (2023) · cites this paper as [108]

    Section 2.3 confirms that the collagen/nano-HA formulation contained 65 wt% nano-HA and 35 wt% collagen to mimic natural bone composition. But the Conclusions say reproducing natural bone architecture was planned for future work, and the constructs’ ability to promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation had yet to be investigated. The paper therefore does not support the claim that the scaffold had already shown those properties. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. R. Cholas, S.K. Padmanabhan, F. Gervaso, G. Udayan, A. Sannino, A. Licciulli, Scaffolds for bone regeneration made of hydroxyapatite microspheres in a collagen matrix, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 63 (2016) 499-505, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec. 2016.03.022. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montalbano, G., Molino, G., Fiorilli, S., & Vitale-Brovarone, C.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Venue
Journal of the European Ceramic Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
3689-3697
ISSN
0955-2219 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005469806
Cited by
84
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 6
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the European Ceramic Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Research Council
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • Horizon 2020 (681798-BOOST)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Keywords
type I collagen, bone scaffolds, 3D bioprinting, extrusion printing, hydrothermal synthesis, shear thinning, sol-gel transition, bone tissue engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review