Cited by 840Bone Tissue Engineering Materials3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration

Open access
Inzana, Jason A., Olvera, Diana, Fuller, Seth M., Kelly, James P., Graeve, Olivia A., Schwarz, Edward M., Kates, Stephen L., Awad, Hani A.·2014·Biomaterials

Abstract

Low temperature 3D printing of calcium phosphate scaffolds holds great promise for fabricating synthetic bone graft substitutes with enhanced performance over traditional techniques. Many design parameters, such as the binder solution properties, have yet to be optimized to ensure maximal biocompatibility and osteoconductivity with sufficient mechanical properties. This study tailored the phosphoric acid-based binder solution concentration to 8.75 wt% to maximize cytocompatibility and mechanical strength, with a supplementation of Tween 80 to improve printing. To further enhance the formulation, collagen was dissolved into the binder solution to fabricate collagen-calcium phosphate composites. Reducing the viscosity and surface tension through a physiologic heat treatment and Tween 80, respectively, enabled reliable thermal inkjet printing of the collagen solutions. Supplementing the binder solution with 1-2 wt% collagen significantly improved maximum flexural strength and cell viability. To assess the bone healing performance, we implanted 3D printed scaffolds into a critically sized murine femoral defect for 9 weeks. The implants were confirmed to be osteoconductive, with new bone growth incorporating the degrading scaffold materials. In conclusion, this study demonstrates optimization of material parameters for 3D printed calcium phosphate scaffolds and enhancement of material properties by volumetric collagen incorporation via inkjet printing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.064

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additive manufacturing is a widely used technique that can develop scaffolds with a controllable shape having required porosity.

    “Additive manufacturing is one of the widely used techniques that can develop scaffolds with a controllable shape having required porosity [77,78].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Sinha K Pearson B Casolco SR Garay JE Graeve OA Synthesis and consolidation of BaAl2Si2O8:Eu: development of an integrated process for luminescent smart ceramic materials J Am Ceram Soc 2009 92 11 2504 2511

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inzana, J. A., Olvera, D., Fuller, S. M., Kelly, J. P., Graeve, O. A., Schwarz, E. M., Kates, S. L., & Awad, H. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Alfred University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Awad, Hani A.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
35
Issue
13
Pages
4026-4034
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993037781
Cited by
840
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 11
FWCI
36.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • AO Trauma Research Fund
  • NIAMS/NIH
  • NSF graduate research fellowship (2012116002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Keywords
calcium phosphate scaffolds, 3D printing, bone regeneration, bone graft substitutes, thermal inkjet printing, Tween 80, flexural strength, cytocompatibility, osteoconductivity, critical-size femoral defect, scaffold degradation, biocompatibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone Regeneration, Calcium Phosphates, Cell Survival, Collagen, Female, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Viscosity, Tissue Engineering, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds, Printing, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review