The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate culture: Evidence from the field
Open accessAbstract
Ninety-two percent of the 1348 North American executives we survey believe that improving corporate culture would increase firm value. A striking 84% believe their company needs to improve its culture. But how can that be achieved? Our paper provides some guidance by documenting the following: executives’ views on what corporate culture is and how it operates, distinguishing between stated values and everyday norms; the extent to which culture is perceived to influence value creation (productivity, mergers), ethical choices (compliance, short-termism), and innovation (creativity, risk-taking); and a list of obstacles that can prevent culture from being where it should be (inattentive leaders, misaligned incentive compensation). Finally, we provide evidence that the executives’ survey responses are consistent with external data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x · Cited by 16,243
Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems
Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 · Cited by 9,648
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0 · Cited by 8,097
The economic implications of corporate financial reporting
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002 · Cited by 6,316
Self-citationMultitask principal – agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design
Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24 · Cited by 6,046
The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field
Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00044-7 · Cited by 5,939
Self-citationEarnings management through real activities manipulation
Roychowdhury, S. (2006) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002 · Cited by 5,405
North, D. C. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.97 · Cited by 5,232
O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256404 · Cited by 4,519
Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences
Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001 · Cited by 4,159
Cited by
Decoding the impact of firm‐level ESG performance on financial disclosure quality
Ferdous, L. T., Rana, T., & Yeboah, R. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3982 · Cited by 46
Are All ESG Funds Created Equal? Only Some Funds Are Committed
Lowry, M. B., Wang, P., & Wei, K. D. (2022) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4104700 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, J. R., Grennan, J., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Financial Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 552-593
- ISSN
- 0304-405X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123063148
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 151.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate culture: Evidence from the field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.07.008
- The paper
- Graham, J. R., Grennan, J., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2022). Corporate culture: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.07.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
