The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification and antioxidant assays of polyphenols: a review
Open accessAbstract
Polyphenols are widely recognized as the effective antioxidants, which are divided into flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, lignans, tannins and so on. They could regulate internal functions and protect the body from diseases related to oxidative damage. Due to the fact that their antioxidant capacity is influenced by the structure, stability and bioavailability, the detection of their bioactivity should be considered comprehensively. Currently, the methods for measuring the antioxidant capacity of phenolic compounds are divided into chemical, cell-based and in vivo assays. The chemical assays include 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), ferric reducing /antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), peroxyl radical scavenging capacity (PSC), which are rapid identification method, but their reaction mechanism has a great gap with the internal body response. The cell-based assays are more consistent with biological reaction, but still do not take the bioavailability into consideration. The in vivo assays, which commonly utilized Caenorhabditis elegans or rats as models, are more representative, but these methods are more complex and spend longer. This review summarizes the antioxidant evaluation methods of phenolic compounds and discusses their advantages and limitations comparatively, which could help discriminate and select the appropriate assay in the actual operation, and facilitate the development of comprehensive approaches as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a Measure of “Antioxidant Power”: The FRAP Assay
Benzie, I. F. F., & Strain, J. J. (1996) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.1996.0292 · Cited by 22,951
The Chemistry behind Antioxidant Capacity Assays
Huang, D., Ou, B., & Prior, R. L. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf030723c · Cited by 6,162
Miller, N. J., Rice-Evans, C., Davies, M. J., Gopinathan, V., & Milner, A. (1993) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs0840407 · Cited by 3,105
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Khoo, H. E., Azlan, A., Tang, S. T., & Lim, S. M. (2017) · Food & Nutrition Research · doi:10.1080/16546628.2017.1361779 · Cited by 2,969
Pulido, R., Bravo, L., & Saura-Calixto, F. (2000) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf9913458 · Cited by 2,110
Tea catechins and polyphenols: Health effects, metabolism, and antioxidant functions
Higdon, J. V., & Frei, B. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408690390826464 · Cited by 1,854
Antioxidant activity of food constituents: an overview
Gülçin, İ. (2012) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-011-0774-2 · Cited by 1,663
Huang, D., Ou, B., Hampsch-Woodill, M., Flanagan, J. A., & Prior, R. L. (2002) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0201529 · Cited by 1,566
Prior, R. L., Hoang, H., Gu, L., Wu, X., Bacchiocca, M., Howard, L., Hampsch-Woodill, M., Huang, D., Ou, B., & Jacob, R. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0262256 · Cited by 1,455
Metadata
- Authors
- Lang, Y., Gao, N., Zang, Z., Meng, X., Lin, Y., Yang, S., Yang, Y., Jin, Z., & Li, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Future Foods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-204
- ISSN
- 2772-5669 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386940567
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 120
- FWCI
- 32.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification and antioxidant assays of polyphenols: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.07.002
- The paper
- Lang, Y., Gao, N., Zang, Z., Meng, X., Lin, Y., Yang, S., Yang, Y., Jin, Z., & Li, B. (2024). Classification and antioxidant assays of polyphenols: a review. Journal of Future Foods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.