The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental study of arsenic removal by direct contact membrane distillation
Open accessAbstract
Arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) removal by direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) were investigated with self-made polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes in the present work. Permeability and ion rejection efficiency of the membrane were tested before the arsenic removal experiments. A maximum permeate flux 20.90 kg/m(2)h was obtained, and due to the hydrophobic property, the PVDF membrane had high rejection of inorganic anions and cations which was independent of the solution pH and the temperature. The experimental results indicated that DCMD process had higher removal efficiency of arsenic than pressure-driven membrane processes, especially for high-concentration arsenic and arsenite removal. The experimental results indicated that the permeate As(III) and As(V) were under the maximum contaminant limit (10 microg/L) until the feed As(III) and As(V) achieved 40 and 2000 mg/L, respectively. The 250 h simultaneous DCMD performance of 0.5mg/L As(III) and As(V) solution was carried out, respectively. The permeate arsenic was not detected during the process which showed the PVDF membrane had stable arsenic removal efficiency. Membrane morphology changed slightly after the experiments, however, the permeability and the ion rejection of the membrane did not change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and more than 99% for As 3+ and As 5+72 .”
From Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review (2021) · cites this paper as [72]
Citations
Cites
A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters
Smedley, P. L., & Kinniburgh, D. G. (2002) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0883-2927(02)00018-5 · Cited by 7,691
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Lawson, K. W., & Lloyd, D. R. (1997) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(96)00236-0 · Cited by 1,917
Adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on titanium dioxide suspensions
Dutta, P. K., Ray, A. K., Sharma, V. K., & Millero, F. J. (2004) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2004.06.015 · Cited by 415
Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on red mud
Altundogan, H. S., Altundoğan, S., Tümen, F., & Bildik, M. (2000) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/s0956-053x(00)00031-3 · Cited by 366
Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis
Ning, R. Y. (2002) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00262-x · Cited by 357
Removal of arsenic from groundwater using low cost ferruginous manganese ore
Chakravarty, S., Dureja, V., Bhattacharyya, G., Maity, S., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2002) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00234-2 · Cited by 313
An overview of arsenic removal by pressure-drivenmembrane processes
Shih, M. (2005) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2004.07.031 · Cited by 299
Effect of pH on the removal of arsenic and antimony using reverse osmosis membranes
Kang, M., Kawasaki, M., Tamada, S., Kamei, T., & Magara, Y. (2000) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(00)90027-4 · Cited by 285
Osmotic concentration of liquid foods
Petrotos, K., & Lazarides, H. N. (2001) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0260-8774(00)00222-3 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review
Qasem, N. A. A., Mohammed, R. H., & Lawal, D. U. (2021) · npj Clean Water · doi:10.1038/s41545-021-00127-0 · Cited by 2,225
Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: A review
Singh, R., Singh, S., Parihar, P., Singh, V. P., & Prasad, S. M. (2014) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.10.009 · Cited by 1,123
Mondal, P., Bhowmick, S., Chatterjee, D., Figoli, A., & der Bruggen, B. V. (2013) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.097 · Cited by 337
Electrocoagulation treatment of arsenic in wastewaters: A comprehensive review
Song, P., Yang, Z., Zeng, G., Yang, X., Xu, H., Wang, L., Xu, R., Xiong, W., & Ahmad, K. (2017) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.086 · Cited by 314
Removal of arsenic species from water by batch and column operations on bagasse fly ash
Ali, I., ALOthman, Z. A., Al‐Warthan, A., Asim, M., & Khan, T. A. (2013) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-013-2235-3 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Qu, D., Wang, J., Hou, D., Luan, Z., Fan, B., & Zhao, C.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Luan, Zhaokun
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 874-879
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018723048
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ir.rcees.ac.cn
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
- Keywords
- arsenic removal, direct contact membrane distillation, arsenite, arsenate, PVDF membranes, ion rejection, permeate flux, hydrophobic membranes, arsenic removal efficiency, membrane stability
- MeSH terms
- Arsenic, Filtration, Fluorocarbon Polymers, Ions, Membranes, Artificial, Permeability, Polyvinyls, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Arsenites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review