Cited by 85TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalAnalytical chemistry methods development

Synthesis of core–shell bioaffinity chitosan–TiO2 composite and its environmental applications

Xiao, Gang, Su, Haijia, Tan, Tianwei·2015·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Based on the coupling of molecular imprinting, chitosan biosorption, and nano TiO2 photocatalysis technologies, a novel core-shell organic-inorganic hybrid material of surface imprinted chitosan-TiO2 composite (SICT) was prepared with methyl orange as the template. SEM, EDS, AFM, pore size analysis, and FTIR characterization results illustrated that TiO2 nano powder was successfully coated on the surface of chitosan microparticles via intermolecular hydrogen bonds to form the core-shell organic-inorganic composites with rough and porous surface morphology. SICT showed enhanced photocatalytic selectivity for methyl orange (M.O.) compared with the non-imprinted chitosan-TiO2 composites because of the existing of more suitable sites generated by surface molecular imprinting. The removal of M.O. by SICT was mainly from the photocatalytic degradation rather than simple adsorption. SICT could be reused directly without further desorption and regeneration for 10 cycles with preserving 60% of its photocatalytic efficiency. The reusability of SICT would be beneficial for the simplification of the operating steps and the cost reduction which facilitated its practical applications in wastewater treatment concerning environmental organic pollutants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.047

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Xiao, G., Su, H., & Tan, T.
Affiliations
Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Su, Haijia
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
283
Pages
888-896
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086566256
Cited by
85
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
core-shell composites, surface imprinting, photocatalytic degradation, methyl orange, titanium dioxide nanoparticles, organic-inorganic hybrid materials, dye removal, wastewater treatment, adsorbent reusability, environmental pollutants
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Azo Compounds, Coloring Agents, Titanium, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Porosity, Chitosan, Metal Nanoparticles, Molecular Imprinting, Photochemical Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review