Cited by 571Extraction and Separation ProcessesRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesMetal Extraction and Bioleaching

Novel approach to recover cobalt and lithium from spent lithium-ion battery using oxalic acid

Zeng, Xianlai, Li, Jinhui, Shen, Bingyu·2015·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

With the booming of consumer electronics (CE) and electric vehicle (EV), a large number of spent lithium-ion battery (LIBs) have been generated worldwide. Resource depletion and environmental concern driven from the sustainable industry of CE and EV have motivated spent LIBs should be recovered urgently. However, the conventional process combined with leaching, precipitating, and filtering was quite complicated to recover cobalt and lithium from spent LIBs. In this work, we developed a novel recovery process, only combined with oxalic acid leaching and filtering. When the optimal parameters for leaching process is controlled at 150 min retention time, 95 °C heating temperature, 15 g L(-1) solid-liquid ratio, and 400 rpm rotation rate, the recovery rate of lithium and cobalt from spent LIBs can reach about 98% and 97%, respectively. Additionally, we also tentatively discovered the leaching mechanism of lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO2) using oxalic acid, and the leaching order of the sampling LiCoO2 of spent LIBs. All the obtained results can contribute to a short-cut and high-efficiency process of spent LIBs recycling toward a sound closed-loop cycle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.064

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, X., Li, J., & Shen, B.
Affiliations
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Jinhui
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
295
Pages
112-118
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064585402
Cited by
571
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7
FWCI
27.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Tsinghua University
  • Key Technologies Research and Development Program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
Keywords
spent lithium-ion batteries, cobalt recovery, lithium recovery, oxalic acid leaching, battery recycling, LiCoO2, leaching mechanism, electric vehicle batteries, closed-loop recycling
MeSH terms
Cobalt, Lithium, Oxalic Acid, Electronic Waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review