The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A green process for exfoliating electrode materials and simultaneously extracting electrolyte from spent lithium-ion batteries
Abstract
Recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has aroused extensive attentions with the expanding demand of electric vehicles. Two considerable challenges of LIBs recycling were separating electrode materials from metallic foils and reclaiming hazardous electrolyte. In the current study, an environmentally benign process was developed to recovery electrode materials and hazardous electrolyte. The main merits were that no strong acid or alkali was applied in the process, and the electrode materials were reclaimed in flaky form. A special complex aqueous peeling agent, namely exfoliating and extracting solution (AEES) was manufactured and applied in the process. The results indicated that cathode material could be exfoliated from Al foil by weakening the mechanical interlocking force and Coulomb force between cathode materials and foils. Ethylene carbonate (EC) and propylene carbonate (PC) could be extracted from electrodes and separators and recovered via distillation. LiPF6 could be precipitated from EC and PC and recovered via filtration. The conditions could be precisely controlled by optimizing the concentration of AEES. The recovery efficiencies of electrolyte, Al foil, Cu foil and electrode materials were 95.6%, 99.0%, 100% and near 100%, respectively. The process efficiently avoided infiltration of impurities into the electrode materials and is environmentally friendly for industrial application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Zhang, T., He, Y., Wang, F., Ge, L., Zhu, X., & Li, H. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.01.002 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Or, T., Gourley, S. W. D., Kaliyappan, K., Yu, A., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Carbon Energy · doi:10.1002/cey2.29 · Cited by 559
Jung, J. C.-Y., Sui, P.-C., & Zhang, J. (2021) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2020.102217 · Cited by 549
Progresses in Sustainable Recycling Technology of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Du, K., Ang, E. H., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12271 · Cited by 458
A comprehensive review on the pretreatment process in lithium-ion battery recycling
Kim, S., Bang, J., Yoo, J., Shin, Y., Bae, J., Jeong, J., Kim, K., Dong, P., & Kwon, K. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126329 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- He, K., Zhang, Z.-Y., Alai, L., & Zhang, F.-S.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 375
- Pages
- 43-51
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2931756339
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A green process for exfoliating electrode materials and simultaneously extracting electrolyte from spent lithium-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.120
- The paper
- He, K., Zhang, Z.-Y., Alai, L., & Zhang, F.-S. (2019). A green process for exfoliating electrode materials and simultaneously extracting electrolyte from spent lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.