CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioaccumulation of fluoride from aqueous system and genotoxicity study on Allium cepa using Bacillus licheniformis

Thesai, Annadurai Sakthi, Nagarajan, Govindan, Rajakumar, Sundaram, Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan, Ayyasamy, Pudukadu Munusamy·2021·Journal of Hazardous Materials
DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124367
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Removal of fluoride (F - ) was performed using a novel bacterium isolated from F - contaminated soil collected from Pappireddipatti block of Dharmapuri District in Tamil Nadu, India. Impact of changing variables for the removal of F - from synthetic medium at different concentrations of carbon and nitrogen sources (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 g) was studied with bio inoculants of the bacterial strain (PPR8). The effects of different environmental parameters viz., pH (5.0-9.0) and temperature (25-45 °C) on the biosorption of F - biosorption were also evaluated. The strain PPR8 was identified as Bacillus licheniformis through 16S rRNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. Bioaccumulation of F - in the bacterial cells was confirmed by FTIR, SEM and TEM-EDAX and almost 97% of F - removal was established. To test the potential applicability of the bacterium, the bioreactor study was carried out with F - contaminated groundwater collected from the contaminated area. Furthermore, the treated and untreated F - contaminated waters were used to evaluate the genotoxicity on the root cells of onion (Allium cepa) by root tip assay. The experimental results proved that the significant removal of F - by Bacillus licheniformis PPR8 (KX646393) and it could be used as a potential adsorbent in removing F - from contaminated ground waters.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124367

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Agersø, 2019, Putative antibiotic resistance genes present in extant Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus paralicheniformis strains are probably intrinsic and part of the ancient resistome, PloS One, 14, 10.1371/journal.pone.0210363 · DOI
  2. Al-Homaidan, 2015, Adsorptive removal of cadmium ions by Spirulina platensis dry biomass, Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 22, 795, 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.06.010 · DOI
  3. Amin, 2015, Biosorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by white-rot fungus Pleurotus eryngii ATCC 90888, Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag., 3, 30
  4. Annadurai, 2019, Batch and column approach on biosorption of fluoride from aqueous medium using live, dead and various pretreated Aspergillus niger (FS18) biomass, Surf. Interfaces, 15, 60, 10.1016/j.surfin.2019.01.013 · DOI
  5. Baker, 2012, Widespread genetic switches and toxicity resistance proteins for fluoride, Science, 335, 233, 10.1126/science.1215063 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chaudhary, 2019, Improvement in fluoride remediation technology using GIS based mapping of fluoride contaminated groundwater and microbe assisted phytoremediation, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 168, 164, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.007 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2020, Bioaccumulation and biosorption activities of indoor metal-tolerant Penicillium simplicissimum for removal of toxic metals, Int. J. Environ. Res., 14, 1, 10.1007/s41742-020-00253-6 · DOI
  8. Chouhan, 2012, Isolation, identification and characterization of fluoride resistant bacteria: possible role in bioremediation, Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 48, 43, 10.1134/S0003683812010036 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dartan, 2017, Analysis of fluoride pollution from fertilizer industry and phosphogypsum piles in agricultural area, J. Ind. Pollut. Control, 33, 662
  10. Das, 2016, Deleneation of groundwater quality in the presence of fluoride in selected villages of Simlapal block, Bankura district, West Bengal, India, Sustain. Water Resour. Manag., 2, 439, 10.1007/s40899-016-0075-2 · DOI
  11. Dhanarani, 2016, Comparative study on the biosorption of aluminum by free and immobilized cells of Bacillus safensis KTSMBNL 26 isolated from explosive contaminated soil, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 69, 61, 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.09.032 · DOI
  12. M. Dutta, B. Pan, K. Ghosh, P. Saha, S. Roy, 2018. Isolation of fluoride tolerant Bacillus spp (KT201599, KT201600) from the midgut of Drosophila melanogaster: their probable role in fluoride removal, in: Proceedings of the Zoological Society, Springer, pp. 1–9. · DOI
  13. Dwivedi, 2016, Bioremoval of fluoride from synthetic water using gram-negative bacteria Shewanella putrefaciens, J. Hazard., Toxic. Radioact. Waste, 21
  14. Gao, 2019, Indigenous microbes induced fluoride release from aquifer sediments, Environ. Pollut., 252, 580, 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.118 · DOI
  15. De Gisi, 2016, Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 9, 10
  16. Gitari, 2020, Synthesis, characterization and batch assessment of groundwater fluoride removal capacity of trimetal Mg/Ce/Mn oxide-modified diatomaceous earth, Arab. J. Chem., 13, 1, 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.01.002 · DOI
  17. Guo, 2013, Removal of fluoride and arsenate from aqueous solution by hydrocalumite via precipitation and anion exchange, Chem. Eng. J., 231, 121, 10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.025 · DOI
  18. Huang, 2011, Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution onto Zr-loaded garlic peel (Zr-GP) particles, J. Cent. South Univ. Technol., 18, 1448, 10.1007/s11771-011-0860-x · DOI
  19. Iriel, 2018, The removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by a lateritic soil adsorption: kinetic and equilibrium studies, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 149, 166, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.016 · DOI
  20. Jia, 2019, Fluoride occurrence and human health risk in drinking water wells from southern edge of Chinese loess plateau, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 1683, 10.3390/ijerph16101683 · DOI
  21. Joshua Amarnath, 2015, Evaluating fluoride contamination in ground water of Dharmapuri District in Tamilnadu, J. Chem. Pharmac Sci., 8
  22. Khan, 2019, Mutagenicity and genotoxicity evaluation of textile industry wastewater using bacterial and plant bioassays, Toxicol. Rep., 6, 193, 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.02.002 · DOI
  23. Krulwich, 2011, Molecular aspects of bacterial pH sensing and homeostasis, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 9, 330, 10.1038/nrmicro2549 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kulkarn, 2017, Adsorptive removal of fluoride from water samples using Azospirillum biofertilizer and lignite, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34, 1
  25. Kumari, 2019, Characterization of pharmaceuticals industrial effluent using GC–MS and FT-IR analyses and defining its toxicity, Appl. Water Sci., 9, 185, 10.1007/s13201-019-1064-z · DOI
  26. Kumari, 2016, Genotoxicity evaluation of tannery effluent treated with newly isolated hexavalent chromium reducing Bacillus cereus, J. Environ. Manag., 183, 204, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.017 · DOI
  27. Liyanage, 2017, Impact of population growth on the water quality of natural water bodies, Sustainability, 9, 1405, 10.3390/su9081405 · DOI
  28. Li, 2019, Occurrence and health implication of fluoride in groundwater of loess aquifer in the Chinese loess plateau: a case study of Tongchuan, Northwest China, Expo. Health, 11, 95, 10.1007/s12403-018-0278-x · DOI
  29. Li, 2013, Eukaryotic resistance to fluoride toxicity mediated by a widespread family of fluoride export proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 19018, 10.1073/pnas.1310439110 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Macdonald, 2017, A topologically diverse family of fluoride channels, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 45, 142, 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Melidis, 2015, Fluoride removal from aluminium finishing wastewater by hydroxyapatite, Environ. Process., 2, 205, 10.1007/s40710-014-0056-0 · DOI
  32. Mishra, 2012, Optimization and characterization of chromium (VI) reduction in saline condition by moderately halophilic Vigribacillus sp. isolated from mangrove soil of Bhitarkanika, India, J. Hazard. Mater., 227, 219, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.063 · DOI
  33. Mohammad, 2019, Adsorptive and Bio removal of fluoride from synthetic waste water by using Actinobacter immobilized on the surface of sweet lemon peel, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 8, 132
  34. Mondal, 2016, Biosorption of fluoride from aqueous solution using Lichen and its Ca-pretreated biomass, Water Conserv. Sci. Eng., 1, 143, 10.1007/s41101-016-0009-8 · DOI
  35. Mukherjee, 2016, Assessment of fluoride uptake performance of raw biomass and activated biochar of Colocasia esculenta stem: optimization through response surface methodology, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 35, 1305, 10.1002/ep.12346 · DOI
  36. Mukherjee, 2017, Microbial remediation of fluoride-contaminated water via a novel bacterium Providencia vermicola (KX926492), J. Environ. Manag., 204, 413, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.051 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Mukherjee, 2018, Comparative assessment of the fluoride removal capability of immobilized and dead cells of Staphylococcus lentus (KX941098) isolated from contaminated groundwater, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 37, 1573, 10.1002/ep.12853 · DOI
  38. Mukherjee, 2017, Characterization of a fluoride-resistant bacterium Acinetobacter sp. RH5 towards assessment of its water defluoridation capability, Appl. Water Sci., 7, 1923, 10.1007/s13201-015-0370-3 · DOI
  39. Oulebsir, 2020, Preparation of mesoporous alumina electro-generated by electrocoagulation in NaCl electrolyte and application in fluoride removal with consistent regenerations, Arab. J. Chem., 13, 271, 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.04.007 · DOI
  40. Oves, 2013, Biosorption of heavy metals by Bacillus thuringiensis strain OSM29 originating from industrial effluent contaminated north Indian soil, Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 20, 121, 10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.11.006 · DOI
  41. Paudyal, 2018, Removal of fluoride by effectively using spent cation exchange resin, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 20, 975, 10.1007/s10163-017-0659-4 · DOI
  42. Qin, 2019, Improving cadmium resistance in Escherichia coli through continuous genome evolution, frontiers in microbiology, Evol. Genom. Microbiol., 10, 278
  43. Qiusheng, 2015, Porous zirconium alginate beads adsorbent for fluoride adsorption from aqueous solutions, RSC Adv., 5, 2100, 10.1039/C4RA12036A · DOI
  44. Raj, 2017, Fluoride contamination in groundwater resources of Alleppey, southern India, Geosci. Front., 8, 117, 10.1016/j.gsf.2016.01.002 · DOI
  45. Sakthi Thesai, 2018, Removal of fluoride in aqueous medium under the optimum conditions through intracellular accumulation in Bacillus flexus (PN4), Environ. Technol., 1
  46. Sarah, 2019, Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in Channa punctatus (Bloch) in river Ramganga (UP), India, Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 26, 979, 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.02.009 · DOI
  47. Sharma, 2019, Defluoridation of water using autochthonous bacterial isolates, Environ. Monit. Assess., 191, 781, 10.1007/s10661-019-7928-8 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Shen, 2014, Fluoride and Uranium removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: a review, Chemosphere, 117, 679, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.090 · DOI
  49. Tang, 2018, Enhanced defluoridation capacity from aqueous media via hydroxyapatite decorated with carbon nanotube, Front. Chem., 6, 104, 10.3389/fchem.2018.00104 · DOI
  50. Thakur, 2019, Simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride from synthetic solution through continuous electrocoagulation: operating cost and sludge utilization, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 7, 10.1016/j.jece.2018.102829 · DOI
  51. Tomar, 2014, Adsorptive removal of fluoride from aqueous media using Citrus limonum (lemon) leaf, Microchem. J., 112, 97, 10.1016/j.microc.2013.09.010 · DOI
  52. Verma, 2018, Morphotoxicity and cytogenotoxicity of pendimethalin in the test plant Allium cepa L.-A biomarker based study, Chemosphere, 206, 248, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.177 · DOI
  53. Vincent, 2019, Fluoride levels in saliva and plaque following the use of high fluoride and conventional dentifrices-a triple blinded randomised parallel group trial, Sci. World J., 10.1155/2019/1636209 · DOI
  54. Wei, 2011, Multifunctional Ag@ Fe2O3 yolk–shell nanoparticles for simultaneous capture, kill, and removal of pathogen, J. Mater. Chem., 21, 16344, 10.1039/c1jm13691g · DOI
  55. Yelidji, 2017, Hydrogeological mechanism governing the mineralization and elevated fluoride contents in precambarian crystalline aquifer groundwater in central benin, Western, Africa, Environ. Earth Sci., 76, 691, 10.1007/s12665-017-7000-3 · DOI
  56. Zhang, 2017, Synthesis and properties of a high-capacity iron oxide adsorbent for fluoride removal from drinking water, Appl. Surf. Sci., 425, 272, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.159 · DOI
  57. Zulfiqar, 2019, Correlation of water fluoride with body fluids, dental fluorosis and FT4, FT3–TSH disruption among children in an endemic fluorosis area in Pakistan, Open Chem., 17, 465, 10.1515/chem-2019-0055 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thesai, A. S., Nagarajan, G., Rajakumar, S., Pugazhendhi, A., & Ayyasamy, P. M.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
407
Pages
124367
ISSN
0304-3894
DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124367
Cited by
15
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
University Grants Commission (F-25\u20131/2013\u201314(BSR)/11\u2013142/10, 30/5/2016, SR/FST/LSI-640/2015, 142/10)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review