Cited by 199Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Disease and TransplantationLiver Diseases and Immunity

Repeated FIB-4 measurements can help identify individuals at risk of severe liver disease

Open access
Hagström, Hannes, Talbäck, Mats, Andreasson, Anna, Walldius, Göran, Hammar, Niklas·2020·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is unclear whether the identification of individuals at risk of cirrhosis using non-invasive tests can be improved by repeated measurements. Herein, we tested whether repeated measurements of fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) could improve the identification of individuals at risk of severe liver disease. METHODS: Data were derived from the population-based Swedish AMORIS cohort with baseline examinations from 1985-1996. FIB-4 was calculated at 2 time points within 5 years. Thereafter, we associated changes in FIB-4 with outcomes. Incident severe liver disease data was ascertained through linkage to Swedish national registers until 2011. Hazard ratios (HRs) and CIs for outcomes were calculated using Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 126,942 individuals with available FIB-4 data, 40,729 (32.1%) underwent a second test within 5 years (mean interval 2.4 years). During 613,376 person-years of follow-up, 581 severe liver disease events were documented (0.95/1,000 person-years). An increase of 1 unit in FIB-4 was associated with an elevated risk of severe liver disease (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.81; 95% CI 1.67-1.96). Transitioning from a low- or intermediate- to a high-risk group was associated with an increased risk of severe liver disease compared with those consistently in the low-risk group (aHR 7.99 and 8.64, respectively). A particularly increased risk of severe liver disease was found in individuals defined as high risk at both tests (aHR 17.04; 95% CI 11.67-24.88). However, almost half of all events occurred in those consistently in the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated testing of FIB-4 within 5 years improves the identification of individuals at an increased risk of severe liver disease in the general population. However, the sensitivity is comparatively low and improved tests are needed for screening in a general population or primary care setting. LAY SUMMARY: The fibrosis-4 scoring system is often used to estimate the risk of advanced fibrosis in liver diseases. Herein, we found that changes in this score over time are associated with the risk of future severe liver disease in a population-based cohort. However, even if the prediction is improved by repeated testing, the overall ability of the score to predict future events is relatively low.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.06.007

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagström, H., Talbäck, M., Andreasson, A., Walldius, G., & Hammar, N.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Hagström, Hannes
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
1023-1029
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040545282
Cited by
199
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 3
FWCI
18.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Intercept Pharmaceuticals
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting
  • AstraZeneca
  • Gilead Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
FIB-4, liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, severe liver disease, repeated measures, non-invasive risk prediction, liver disease screening, risk stratification, AMORIS cohort, general population screening, primary care screening
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Sweden, Biomarkers, Comorbidity, Incidence, Disease Progression, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review