Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cell measurements in fresh and cryopreserved blood samples

Open access
Kotsakis, Athanasios, Harasymczuk, Malgorzata, Schilling, Bastian, Georgoulias, Vasilis, Argiris, Athanassios, Whiteside, Theresa L.·2012·Journal of Immunological Methods

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) present in the human peripheral blood, represent a heterogeneous population of cells with monocytic and granulocytic features. To provide guidelines for reliable assessments of the frequency and function of MDSC, we compared fresh vs. cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples obtained from normal controls and patients with cancer. PBMC were obtained from 4 healthy donors and 21 patients with cancer. They were stained with labeled antibodies, and the frequency of DR−/LIN−/CD11b+, DR−/LIN−/CD15+, DR−/LIN−/CD33+ and DR−/low/CD14+ cells was determined by flow cytometry before and after cryopreservation. CFSE-based suppressor assays were used to test inhibitory functions of MDSC. Arginase I expression and reactive oxygen species (ROS) upregulation in MDSC subsets were evaluated by flow cytometry. The DR−/low/CD14+ and DR−/LIN−/CD11b+ subsets of MDSC were found to be more resistant to the cryopreservation/thawing procedure compared to the DR−/LIN−/CD15+ and DR−/LIN−/CD33+ subsets. The frequency of the latter two MDSC subsets was significantly reduced after cryopreservation. All but DR−/LIN−/CD15+ cells inhibited proliferation of autologous CSFE-labeled CD4+ cells but lost suppressor activity after cryopreservation. Only DR−/LIN−/CD15+ cells were positive for Arginase I, but lost its expression after cryopreservation. Only fresh DR−/LIN−/CD11b+ and DR−/LIN−/CD15+ cells produced ROS after in vitro stimulation. Studies of human MDSC should be performed in fresh blood samples. If samples have to be cryopreserved, monitoring of CD11b+ and CD14+ MDSC subsets provides the most reliable results. Arginase I expression or stimulated ROS production assessed by flow cytometry are useful markers for MDSC subsets only in fresh samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jim.2012.04.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Kotsakis, A., Harasymczuk, M., Schilling, B., Georgoulias, V., Argiris, A., & Whiteside, T. L.
Venue
Journal of Immunological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
381
Issue
1-2
Pages
14-22
ISSN
0022-1759 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079357192
Cited by
199
References
4
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myeloid-derived suppressor cell measurements in fresh and cryopreserved blood samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jim.2012.04.004
The paper
Kotsakis, A., Harasymczuk, M., Schilling, B., Georgoulias, V., Argiris, A., & Whiteside, T. L. (2012). Myeloid-derived suppressor cell measurements in fresh and cryopreserved blood samples. Journal of Immunological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2012.04.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.