Cited by 543Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis

Baseline Peripheral Blood Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcome of Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab

Open access
Martens, Alexander, Wistuba-Hamprecht, Kilian, Foppen, Marnix Geukes, Yuan, Jianda, Postow, Michael A., Wong, Phillip, Romano, Emanuela, Khammari, Amir +16 more·2016·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: To identify baseline peripheral blood biomarkers associated with clinical outcome following ipilimumab treatment in advanced melanoma patients. Experimental Design: Frequencies of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and regulatory T cells (Treg), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), routine blood counts, and clinical characteristics were assessed in 209 patients. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and best overall response. Statistical calculations were done by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis, including calibration and discrimination by C-statistics. Results: Low baseline LDH, absolute monocyte counts (AMC), Lin−CD14+HLA-DR−/low-MDSC frequencies, and high absolute eosinophil counts (AEC), relative lymphocyte counts (RLC), and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+-Treg frequencies were significantly associated with better survival, and were considered in a combination model. Patients (43.5%) presenting with the best biomarker signature had a 30% response rate and median survival of 16 months. In contrast, patients with the worst biomarkers (27.5%) had only a 3% response rate and median survival of 4 months. The occurrence of adverse events correlated with neither baseline biomarker signatures nor the clinical benefit of ipilimumab. In another model, limited to the routine parameters LDH, AMC, AEC, and RLC, the number of favorable factors (4 vs. 3 vs. 2–0) was also associated with OS (P < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons) in the main study and additionally in an independent validation cohort. Conclusions: A baseline signature of low LDH, AMC, and MDSCs as well as high AEC, Tregs, and RLC is associated with favorable outcome following ipilimumab. Prospective investigation of the predictive impact of these markers following ipilimumab and other treatments, e.g., PD-1 antibodies, is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2908–18. ©2016 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2412

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martens, A., Wistuba-Hamprecht, K., Foppen, M. G., Yuan, J., Postow, M. A., Wong, P., Romano, E., Khammari, A., Dreno, B., Capone, M., Ascierto, P. A., Di Giacomo, A. M., Maio, M., Schilling, B., Sucker, A., Schadendorf, D., Hassel, J. C., Eigentler, T. K., Martus, P., Wolchok, J. D., Blank, C., Pawelec, G., Garbe, C., & Weide, B.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
  • 1Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Institut Curie (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • 7Department of Oncodermatology, INSERM Research Unit 892, University Hospital, Nantes, France.
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
  • 9Division of Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Italy.
  • University of Siena (IT)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Weide, Benjamin
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2016-06-14
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
2908-2918
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2282962877
Cited by
541
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 33 · 2014: 1
FWCI
40.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bristol-Myers-Squibb (Munich, Germany) and EU Seventh Framework Program "PRIAT" (305309 and DFG PA 361-22/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Keywords
advanced melanoma, ipilimumab, predictive biomarkers, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells, lactate dehydrogenase, absolute monocyte count, absolute eosinophil count, overall survival, best overall response, immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-PD-1
MeSH terms
Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Ipilimumab, Aged, Erythrocyte Count, Female, Humans, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Male, Melanoma, Skin Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Treatment Outcome, Lymphocyte Count, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review