Cited by 181Global trade and economicsIncome, Poverty, and InequalityEconomic and Fiscal Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Globalization, inequality and welfare

Antràs, Pol, de Gortari, Alonso, Itskhoki, Oleg·2017·Journal of International Economics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.07.009

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Antràs, P., de Gortari, A., & Itskhoki, O.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Antràs, Pol
Venue
Journal of International Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
108
Pages
387-412
ISSN
0022-1996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2510949641
Cited by
181
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10
FWCI
44.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of International Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
trade liberalization, gains from trade, income inequality, redistribution, distortionary taxation, transfer payments, welfare measurement, marginal tax rates, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review