The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Updates to the integrated protein-protein interaction benchmarks: docking benchmark version 5 and affinity benchmark version 2
Open accessAbstract
We present an updated and integrated version of our widely used protein-protein docking and binding affinity benchmarks. The benchmarks consist of non-redundant, high-quality structures of protein-protein complexes along with the unbound structures of their components. Fifty-five new complexes were added to the docking benchmark, 35 of which have experimentally measured binding affinities. These updated docking and affinity benchmarks now contain 230 and 179 entries, respectively. In particular, the number of antibody-antigen complexes has increased significantly, by 67% and 74% in the docking and affinity benchmarks, respectively. We tested previously developed docking and affinity prediction algorithms on the new cases. Considering only the top 10 docking predictions per benchmark case, a prediction accuracy of 38% is achieved on all 55 cases and up to 50% for the 32 rigid-body cases only. Predicted affinity scores are found to correlate with experimental binding energies up to r=0.52 overall and r=0.72 for the rigid complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
Crystallography & NMR System: A New Software Suite for Macromolecular Structure Determination
Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse‐Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J., Kuszewski, J. J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N., et al. (1998) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444998003254 · Cited by 15,723
A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules
Cornell, W. D., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C. I., Gould, I. R., Merz, K. M., Ferguson, D. M., Spellmeyer, D. C., Fox, T., Caldwell, J. W., & Kollman, P. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00124a002 · Cited by 13,111
Murzin, A. G., Brenner, S. E., Hubbard, T., & Chothia, C. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80134-2 · Cited by 6,435
Jorgensen, W. L., & Tirado‐Rives, J. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00214a001 · Cited by 5,060
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
Self-citationStatistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures
Shen, M., & Šali, A. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062416606 · Cited by 2,294
ZDOCK server: interactive docking prediction of protein–protein complexes and symmetric multimers
Pierce, B. G., Wiehe, K. J., Hwang, H., Kim, B., Vreven, T., & Weng, Z. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097 · Cited by 1,767
Self-citationZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm
Chen, R., Li, L., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10389 · Cited by 1,393
Self-citationThe HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking
de Vries, S. J., van Dijk, M., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2010) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2010.32 · Cited by 1,387
Self-citationGabb, H. A., Jackson, R. M., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1203 · Cited by 820
Fox, N. K., Brenner, S. E., & Chandonia, J.-M. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1240 · Cited by 762
CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions
Janin, J., Henrick, K., Moult, J., Eyck, L. T., Sternberg, M. J. E., Vajda, S., Vakser, I., & Wodak, S. J. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10381 · Cited by 703
FireDock: Fast interaction refinement in molecular docking
Andrusier, N., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21495 · Cited by 679
Accelerating Protein Docking in ZDOCK Using an Advanced 3D Convolution Library
Pierce, B. G., Hourai, Y., & Weng, Z. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024657 · Cited by 645
Self-citationOn the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
Kastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2012) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0835 · Cited by 547
Self-citationProtein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0
Hwang, H., Vreven, T., Janin, J., & Weng, Z. (2010) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22830 · Cited by 474
Self-citationPrediction of protein–protein interactions by docking methods
Smith, G. R., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (2002) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00285-3 · Cited by 450
Assessment of blind predictions of protein–protein interactions: Current status of docking methods
Mendez, R., Leplae, R., Maria, L. D., & Wodak, S. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10393 · Cited by 438
A protein–protein docking benchmark
Chen, R., Mintseris, J., Janin, J., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10390 · Cited by 345
Self-citationpyDock: Electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid‐body protein–protein docking
Cheng, T. M. K., Blundell, T. L., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21419 · Cited by 341
Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction
Mintseris, J., Pierce, B., Wiehe, K., Anderson, R., Chen, R., & Weng, Z. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21502 · Cited by 334
Self-citationCPORT: A Consensus Interface Predictor and Its Performance in Prediction-Driven Docking with HADDOCK
de Vries, S. J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017695 · Cited by 319
Self-citationA structure‐based benchmark for protein–protein binding affinity
Kastritis, P., Moal, I., Hwang, H., Weng, Z., Bates, P. A., Bonvin, A., & Janin, J. (2011) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.580 · Cited by 318
Self-citationRecent Progress and Future Directions in Protein-Protein Docking
Ritchie, D. W. (2008) · Current Protein and Peptide Science · doi:10.2174/138920308783565741 · Cited by 314
Flexible protein–protein docking
Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2006) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2006.02.002 · Cited by 310
Self-citationA novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein‐protein docking
Chen, R., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10334 · Cited by 301
Self-citationSwarmDock: a server for flexible protein–protein docking
Torchala, M., Moal, I. H., Chaleil, R. A. G., Fernández‐Recio, J., & Bates, P. A. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt038 · Cited by 285
Self-citationProtein–protein docking benchmark 2.0: An update
Mintseris, J., Wiehe, K. J., Pierce, B. G., Anderson, R., Chen, R., Janin, J., & Weng, Z. (2005) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20560 · Cited by 278
Self-citationIdentification of Protein–Protein Interaction Sites from Docking Energy Landscapes
Fernández‐Recio, J., Totrov, M. M., & Abagyan, R. A. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.069 · Cited by 274
Tunçbağ, N., Gürsoy, A., Nussinov, R., & Keskin, Ö. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.367 · Cited by 264
Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0
Hwang, H., Pierce, B. G., Mintseris, J., Janin, J., & Weng, Z. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22106 · Cited by 256
Self-citationKastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr9009854 · Cited by 246
Self-citationLu, L. J., Lu, H. J., & Skolnick, J. (2002) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10222 · Cited by 242
PRISM: protein interactions by structural matching
Ogmen, U., Keskin, Ö., Aytuna, A. S., Nussinov, R., & Gürsoy, A. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki585 · Cited by 207
Liu, S., Zhang, C., Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2004) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20019 · Cited by 193
Protein-Protein Complex Structure Predictions by Multimeric Threading and Template Recombination
Mukherjee, S., & Zhang, Y. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.04.006 · Cited by 174
Template-based structure modeling of protein–protein interactions
Szilágyi, A., & Zhang, Y. (2013) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2013.11.005 · Cited by 168
Accounting for conformational changes during protein–protein docking
Zacharias, M. (2010) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2010.02.001 · Cited by 155
SwarmDock and the Use of Normal Modes in Protein-Protein Docking
Moal, I. H., & Bates, P. A. (2010) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms11103623 · Cited by 154
Self-citationKastritis, P. L., Rodrigues, J., Folkers, G. E., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2014.04.017 · Cited by 145
Self-citationA combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance
Pierce, B. G., & Weng, Z. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21920 · Cited by 142
Self-citationKunik, V., Ashkenazi, S., & Ofran, Y. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks480 · Cited by 132
The scoring of poses in protein-protein docking: current capabilities and future directions
Moal, I. H., Torchala, M., Bates, P. A., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-286 · Cited by 119
Self-citationProtein–protein interaction networks: the puzzling riches
Wodak, S. J., Vlasblom, J., Turinsky, A. L., & Pu, S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2013.08.002 · Cited by 113
Protein–protein binding affinity prediction on a diverse set of structures
Moal, I. H., Agius, R., & Bates, P. A. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr513 · Cited by 112
Self-citationIntegrative computational modeling of protein interactions
Rodrigues, J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2014) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.12771 · Cited by 106
Self-citationScoring functions for protein–protein interactions
Moal, I. H., Moretti, R., Baker, D. A., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2013) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2013.06.017 · Cited by 91
Self-citationDocking by structural similarity at protein‐protein interfaces
Sinha, R., Kundrotas, P. J., & Vakser, I. A. (2010) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22812 · Cited by 85
D ockground resource for studying protein–protein interfaces
Douguet, D., Chen, H.-C., Tovchigrechko, A., & Vakser, I. A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl447 · Cited by 84
A protein-DNA docking benchmark
van Dijk, M., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn386 · Cited by 82
Self-citationCCharPPI web server: computational characterization of protein–protein interactions from structure
Moal, I. H., Jiménez‐García, B., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu594 · Cited by 78
Self-citationPrediction of protein–protein binding free energies
Vreven, T., Hwang, H., Pierce, B. G., & Weng, Z. (2012) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2027 · Cited by 76
Self-citationSACS—self-maintaining database of antibody crystal structure information
Allcorn, L. C., & Martin, A. C. R. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.175 · Cited by 74
Pons, C., Talavera, D., de la Cruz, X., Orozco, M., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100353e · Cited by 64
Li, X., Moal, I. H., & Bates, P. A. (2010) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22770 · Cited by 61
Self-citationA protein‐RNA docking benchmark (II): Extended set from experimental and homology modeling data
Pérez‐Cano, L., Jiménez‐García, B., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2012) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24075 · Cited by 51
Self-citationMolecular origins of binding affinity: seeking the Archimedean point
Kastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2013) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2013.07.001 · Cited by 44
Self-citationEvaluating template-based and template-free protein-protein complex structure prediction
Vreven, T., Hwang, H., Pierce, B. G., & Weng, Z. (2013) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbt047 · Cited by 40
Self-citationDesigning coarse grained-and atom based-potentials for protein-protein docking
Tobi, D. (2010) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-10-40 · Cited by 39
Solvated protein–protein docking using Kyte‐Doolittle‐based water preferences
Kastritis, P. L., Visscher, K. M., van Dijk, A. D. J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2012) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24210 · Cited by 36
Self-citationMoal, I. H., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400295z · Cited by 35
Self-citationNon-interacting surface solvation and dynamics in protein-protein interactions
Visscher, K. M., Kastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24741 · Cited by 29
Self-citationMoure, C. M., Bowman, B. R., Gershon, P. D., & Quiocho, F. A. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.03.015 · Cited by 29
Performance of ZDOCK in CAPRI rounds 20–26
Vreven, T., Pierce, B. G., Hwang, H., & Weng, Z. (2013) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24432 · Cited by 29
Self-citationDocking by Structural Similarity at Protein-Protein Interfaces
Kundrotas, P. J., Sinha, R., & Vakser, I. A. (2010) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.1043 · Cited by 29
A minimal model of protein–protein binding affinities
Janin, J. (2014) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2560 · Cited by 28
Inferring the microscopic surface energy of protein–protein interfaces from mutation data
Moal, I. H., Dapkūnas, J., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24761 · Cited by 13
Self-citationBonvin, A. M. J. J., & Vangone, A. (2015) · Harvard SBGrid · doi:10.15785/sbgrid/131 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,022
Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning
Gaínza, P., Sverrisson, F., Monti, F., Rodolà, E., Boscaini, D., Bronstein, M. M., & Correia, B. E. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0666-6 · Cited by 839
Performance and Its Limits in Rigid Body Protein-Protein Docking
Desta, I., Porter, K. A., Xia, B., Kozakov, D., & Vajda, S. (2020) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2020.06.006 · Cited by 709
Key Topics in Molecular Docking for Drug Design
Torres, P. H. M., Sodero, A. C. R., Jofily, P., & Silva, F. P. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20184574 · Cited by 703
Protein interface prediction using graph convolutional networks
Fout, A., Ben‐Hur, A., Anderson, C., Chitsaz, H., & Zhou, W. (2017) · Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) · doi:10.25675/3.021826 · Cited by 606
Metadata
- Authors
- Vreven, T., Moal, I. H., Vangone, A., Pierce, B. G., Kastritis, P. L., Torchala, M., Chaleil, R., Jiménez-García, B., Bates, P. A., Fernandez-Recio, J., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Weng, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bates, Paul A.
- Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.
- Weng, Zhiping
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 427
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3031-3041
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4677049
- OpenAlex
- W1030883578
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 23
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (10748)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084884)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein-protein docking, binding affinity prediction, docking benchmark, protein-protein complex, immune complexes, rigid-body docking
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Humans, Polynucleotide Adenylyltransferase, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Thermodynamics, Vaccinia virus, Viral Proteins, Protein Interaction Mapping, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
