Cited by 7Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Nuclear Receptor Interdomain Communication is Mediated by the Hinge with Ligand Specificity

Open access
Hazarika, Saurov, Yu, Tracy, Biswas, Arumay, Dube, Namita, Villalona, Priscilla, Okafor, C. Denise·2024·Journal of Molecular Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Nuclear receptors are ligand-induced transcription factors that bind directly to target genes and regulate their expression. Ligand binding initiates conformational changes that propagate to other domains, allosterically regulating their activity. The nature of this interdomain communication in nuclear receptors is poorly understood, largely owing to the difficulty of experimentally characterizing full-length structures. We have applied computational modeling approaches to describe and study the structure of the full-length farnesoid X receptor (FXR), approximated by the DNA binding domain (DBD) and ligand binding domain (LBD) connected by the flexible hinge region. Using extended molecular dynamics simulations (>10 microseconds) and enhanced sampling simulations, we provide evidence that ligands selectively induce domain rearrangement, leading to interdomain contact. We use protein-protein interaction assays to provide experimental evidence of these interactions, identifying a critical role of the hinge in mediating interdomain contact. Our results illuminate previously unknown aspects of interdomain communication in FXR and provide a framework to enable characterization of other full-length nuclear receptors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168805

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hazarika, S., Yu, T., Biswas, A., Dube, N., Villalona, P., & Okafor, C. D.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Okafor, C. Denise
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
436
Issue
22
Pages
168805
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402829284
Cited by
7
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2144679, CAREER)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM116961)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
nuclear receptors, farnesoid X receptor, inter-domain communication, hinge region, ligand binding, allosteric regulation, domain rearrangement, DNA-binding domain, ligand-binding domain, protein-protein interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review