The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening of traditional Chinese medicinal plants for quorum-sensing inhibitors activity
Open accessAbstract
The misuse of antibiotics has contributed to widespread development of antimicrobial resistance among clinically significant bacterial species. Alternative approaches other than those using antibiotics are needed in the fight against infectious diseases. Quorum sensing (QS) is an intercellular signaling and gene regulatory mechanism, which is used by a number of opportunistic pathogenic bacteria in determining virulence gene expression. The study of QS may yield another strategy for disease control by interference with QS signals. Scientific research on complementary therapies such as traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has focused mainly on its antibacterial properties. To test for anti-QS activity, 10 TCM herbs were screened using two biomonitor strains, Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01. Interference with violacein (purple pigment) production in CV026 (exogenously supplied with homoserine lactone signals), and swarming in PA01, both QS-regulated phenomena, was used as indication of anti-QS activity. Eight of the selected TCM (80%) yielded QS inhibitors: Prunus armeniaca, Prunella vulgaris, Nelumbo nucifera, Panax notoginseng (root and flower), Punica granatum, Areca catechu, and Imperata cylindrica. Compounds that interfere with QS are present in TCM herbs and these medicines may be a rich source of compounds to combat pathogenic bacteria and reduce the development of antibiotic resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacteria as Multicellular Organisms
Shapiro, J. A. (1988) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0688-82 · Cited by 524
Cited by
Plant-Derived Antimicrobial Compounds: Alternatives to Antibiotics
Savoia, D. (2012) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.12.68 · Cited by 601
Borges, A., Abreu, A., Dias, C., Saavedra, M., Borges, F., & Simões, M. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21070877 · Cited by 308
Singh, D., Singh, V., Bhushan Mishra, S., Sharma, D., & Agarwal, V. (2022) · Journal of Applied Biomedicine · doi:10.32725/jab.2022.005 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Koh, K. H., & Tham, F.-Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 144-148
- ISSN
- 1684-1182 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002069786
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening of traditional Chinese medicinal plants for quorum-sensing inhibitors activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmii.2009.10.001
- The paper
- Koh, K. H., & Tham, F.-Y. (2011). Screening of traditional Chinese medicinal plants for quorum-sensing inhibitors activity. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2009.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.