Cited by 198Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: An eye-movement investigation

Open access
Ferguson, Heather J., Sanford, Anthony J.·2008·Journal of Memory and Language

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.007

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of AI, explanation often bases on judgments about why a certain outcome is predicted by an AI algorithm and hypotheses about causes with respect to given effects.

    “In the context of AI, it often bases on judgments about why a certain outcome is predicted by an AI algorithm and hypotheses about causes with respect to given effects [10].”
  • Lombrozo treated counterfactual and contrastive explanations as equivalent assuming hypothesized events non-occurred in reality to be counterfactual cases where a subset of these cases forms a contrastive explanation.

    “For instance, Lombrozo treated counterfactual and contrastive explanations as equivalent assuming hypothesized events non-occurred in reality to be ''counterfactual cases'' where a subset of these cases forms a contrastive explanation [10].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: University Press.
  2. Evans, J.St.B.T. & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  3. Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. In A von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.). Semantik: Ein internationals Handbuch der zeitgnössischen Forschung, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp 639-650.
  5. Ni, W., Fodor, J.D., Crain, S. & Shankweiler, D.P. (1998). Anomalous strings: Eye movement patterns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27 (5), 515-539.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, H. J., & Sanford, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Heather J.
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
609-626
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990056467
Cited by
198
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
17.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Keywords
counterfactual reasoning, counterfactual worlds, real-world knowledge, sentence comprehension, eye movements, context effects, accommodation, psycholinguistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review