Cited by 66Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Processing counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals: An fMRI investigation

Open access
Kulakova, Eugenia, Aichhorn, Markus, Schurz, Matthias, Kronbichler, Martin, Perner, Josef·2013·NeuroImage

Abstract

Counterfactual thinking is ubiquitous in everyday life and an important aspect of cognition and emotion. Although counterfactual thought has been argued to differ from processing factual or hypothetical information, imaging data which elucidate these differences on a neural level are still scarce. We investigated the neural correlates of processing counterfactual sentences under visual and aural presentation. We compared conditionals in subjunctive mood which explicitly contradicted previously presented facts (i.e. counterfactuals) to conditionals framed in indicative mood which did not contradict factual world knowledge and thus conveyed a hypothetical supposition. Our results show activation in right occipital cortex (cuneus) and right basal ganglia (caudate nucleus) during counterfactual sentence processing. Importantly the occipital activation is not only present under visual presentation but also with purely auditory stimulus presentation, precluding a visual processing artifact. Thus our results can be interpreted as reflecting the fact that counterfactual conditionals pragmatically imply the relevance of keeping in mind both factual and supposed information whereas the hypothetical conditionals imply that real world information is irrelevant for processing the conditional and can be omitted. The need to sustain representations of factual and suppositional events during counterfactual sentence processing requires increased mental imagery and integration efforts. Our findings are compatible with predictions based on mental model theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.060

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The property of contrastiveness presupposes that an explanation answers the why-question regarding the cause of the event in question in terms of hypothesized non-occurring alternatives.

    “The property of contrastiveness presupposes that an explanation answers the given why-question regarding the cause of the event in question (''Why did P happen?'') in terms of hypothesized non-occurring alternatives (''Why did P happen rather than Q?'') [12].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kulakova, E., Aichhorn, M., Schurz, M., Kronbichler, M., & Perner, J.
Affiliations
University of Salzburg (AT)
Corresponding author
Kulakova, Eugenia
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
72
Pages
265-271
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983125601
Cited by
66
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Doctoral College “Imaging the Mind” of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF-W1233)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Keywords
counterfactual reasoning, counterfactuals, hypothetical conditionals, subjunctive mood, indicative mood, sentence processing, mental imagery, mental models theory, caudate nucleus, cuneus, auditory presentation, visual presentation, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review