Cited by 25Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeural dynamics and brain functionAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design

A high aspect ratio microelectrode array for mapping neural activity in vitro

Open access
Kibler, Andrew B., Jamieson, Brian G., Durand, Dominique M.·2012·Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Abstract

A novel high-aspect-ratio penetrating microelectrode array was designed and fabricated for the purpose of recording neural activity. The array allows two dimensional recording of 64 sites in vitro with high aspect ratio penetrating electrodes. Traditional surface electrode arrays, although easy to fabricate, do not penetrate to the viable tissue such as central hippocampus slices and thus have a lower signal/noise ratio and lower selectivity than a penetrating array. In the unfolded hippocampus preparation, the CA1-CA3 pyramidal cell layer in the whole unfolded rodent hippocampus preparation is encased by the alveus on one side and the Schaffer tract on the other and requires penetrating electrodes for high signal to noise ratio recording. An array of 64 electrode spikes, each with a target height of 200μm and diameter of 20μm, was fabricated in silicon on a transparent glass substrate. The impedance of the individual electrodes was measured to be approximately 1.5MΩ±497kΩ. The signal to noise ratio was measured and found to be 19.4±3dB compared to 3.9±0.8dB S/N for signals obtained with voltage sensitive dye RH414. A mouse unfolded hippocampus preparation was bathed in solution containing 50 micro-molar 4-amino pyridine and a complex two dimensional wave of activity was recorded using the array. These results indicate that this novel penetrating electrode array is able to obtain data superior to that of voltage sensitive dye techniques for broad field two-dimensional neuronal activity recording. When used with the unfolded hippocampus preparation, the combination forms a uniquely capable tool for imaging hippocampal network activity in the entire hippocampus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.11.027

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kibler, A. B., Jamieson, B. G., & Durand, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
Corresponding author
Durand, Dominique M.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
204
Issue
2
Pages
296-305
ISSN
0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017397002
Cited by
25
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (R01NS40785)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Keywords
high aspect ratio electrodes, silicon micromachining, electrode impedance, signal-to-noise ratio, 4-aminopyridine, hippocampal network activity
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Microelectrodes, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Nerve Net, Neurons, 4-Aminopyridine, Potassium Channel Blockers, Tissue Culture Techniques, Mice, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, CA3 Region, Hippocampal, Signal-To-Noise Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review