Cited by 116Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsConducting polymers and applications

Progress of flexible electronics in neural interfacing—A self-adaptive non-invasive neural ribbon electrode for small nerves recording

Xiang, Zhuolin, Yen, Shih‐Cheng, Sheshadri, Swathi, Wang, Jiahui, Lee, Sanghoon, Liu, Yu‐Hang, Liao, Lun‐De, Thakor, Nitish V. +1 more·2016·Advanced Materials

Abstract

A novel flexible neural ribbon electrode with a self-adaptive feature is successfully implemented for various small nerves recording. As a neural interface, the selective recording capability is characterized by having reliable signal acquisitions from the sciatic nerve and its branches such as the peroneal nerve, the tibial nerve, and the sural nerve.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201503423

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reducing the thickness of the substrate and the metal layer can decrease the mechanical mismatch to some extent, such as in 2D extraneural electrodes based on polyimide and parylene-C.

    “Reducing the thickness of the substrate and the metal layer can decrease the mechanical mismatch to some extent, such as the more recently developed 2D extraneural electrodes, which are based on polyimide (PI) and parylene-C (9–12).”
  • The EI value of the twining electrodes is ~1.0 × 10−10 N·m2, while traditional silicone rubber- and PI-based extraneural electrodes have EI values of ~2.1 × 10−7 N·m2 and ~4.6 × 10−10 N·m2, respectively.

    “The EI values of traditional silicone rubber– and PI-based extraneural electrodes are usually ~2.1 × 10−7 N·m2 and ~4.6 × 10−10 N·m2, respectively (5, 8, 9, 43), while the EI value of the twining electrodes is ~1.0 × 10−10 N·m2 (note S2).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiang, Z., Yen, S., Sheshadri, S., Wang, J., Lee, S., Liu, Y., Liao, L., Thakor, N. V., & Lee, C.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Chengkuo
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-16
Volume
28
Issue
22
Pages
4472-4479
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2258620306
Cited by
116
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation (NRF) CRP project (R-263-000-A27-281)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
Keywords
sciatic nerve, peroneal nerve, tibial nerve, sural nerve, neural interfaces
MeSH terms
Electrodes, Humans, Peroneal Nerve, Sciatic Nerve, Tibial Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review