Cited by 86Barrier Structure and Function StudiesMosquito-borne diseases and controlinterferon and immune responses

Virus entry and replication in the brain precedes blood-brain barrier disruption during intranasal alphavirus infection

Open access
Cain, Matthew D., Salimi, Hamid, Gong, Yongfeng, Yang, Lihua, Hamilton, Samantha L., Heffernan, James R., Hou, Jianghui, Miller, Mark J. +1 more·2017·Journal of Neuroimmunology

Abstract

Viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are often associated with blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, yet the impact of virus replication and immune cell recruitment on BBB integrity are incompletely understood. Using two-photon microscopy, we demonstrate that Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) strain TC83-GFP, a GFP expressing, attenuated strain with a G3A mutation within the 5' UTR that is associated with increased sensitivity to type I interferons (IFNs), does not directly impact BBB permeability. Following intranasal infection of both wild-type and IFN-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1 (IFIT1)-deficient mice, which fail to block TC83-specific RNA translation, virus spreads to the olfactory bulb and cortex via migration along axonal tracts of neurons originating from the olfactory neuroepithelium. Global dissemination of virus in the CNS by 2days post-infection (dpi) was associated with increased BBB permeability in the olfactory bulb, but not in the cortex or hindbrain, where permeability only increased after the recruitment of CX3CR1+ and CCR2+ mononuclear cells on 6 dpi, which corresponded with tight junction loss and claudin 5 redistribution. Importantly, despite higher levels of viral replication, similar results were obtained in IFIT1-deficient mice. These findings indicate that TC83 gains CNS access via anterograde axonal migration without directly altering BBB function and that mononuclear and endothelial cell interactions may underlie BBB disruption during alphavirus encephalitis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.04.008

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of hippocampal astrocytes and microglia leads to encephalitis and neurological damage.

    “which is well characterized to lead to encephalitis and neurological damage (Cain et al., 2017; Sharma et al., 2011).”

    From Arbovirus infection increases the risk for the development of neurodegenerative disease pathology in the murine model (2024) · cites this paper as Cain et al., 2017

    Results §3.1 reports infection of astrocytes, and Results §3.3 reports microglial accumulation near blood–brain barrier disruption during infection. Methods §2.2 describes an encephalitis mouse model, but the paper does not establish that activation of hippocampal astrocytes and microglia causes encephalitis or neurological damage; its reported observations concern the olfactory bulb and cortex. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cain, M. D., Salimi, H., Gong, Y., Yang, L., Hamilton, S. L., Heffernan, J. R., Hou, J., Miller, M. J., & Klein, R. S.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
  • Miller, Mark J.
  • Klein, Robyn S.
Venue
Journal of Neuroimmunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
308
Pages
118-130
ISSN
0165-5728 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2611233682
Cited by
86
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroimmunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (U19 AI083019, R01 NS052632, R01DK084059, HDTRA11510032, R01 DK097, U01 AI095550, R01 AI077600)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30AR048335)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
Keywords
Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, alphavirus, blood-brain barrier disruption, olfactory bulb, CCR2+ monocytes, IFIT1, type I interferon, claudin-5, tight junctions, intranasal infection, encephalitis
MeSH terms
CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Capillary Permeability, Cells, Cultured, Cerebral Cortex, Disease Models, Animal, Encephalitis Virus, Venezuelan Equine, Epithelial Cells, Gene Expression Regulation, Cricetinae, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Virus Replication, Alphavirus Infections, Receptors, Chemokine, Adaptor Protein Complex 1, Mice, Virus Internalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review