Cited by 251Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionDigital Media and Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Connecting alone: Smartphone use, quality of social interactions and well-being

Open access
Rotondi, Valentina, Stanca, Luca, Tomasuolo, Miriam·2017·Journal of Economic Psychology

Abstract

This paper investigates the role played by the smartphone for the quality of social interactions and subjective well-being. We argue that, due to its intrusiveness, the smartphone reduces the quality of face-to-face interactions and, as a consequence, their positive impact on well-being. We test this hypothesis in a large and representative sample of Italian individuals. The results indicate that time spent with friends is worth less, in terms of life satisfaction, for individuals who use the smartphone. This finding is robust to the use of instrumental variables estimation to deal with possible endogeneity. We also show that, consistent with our hypothesis, the positive association between time spent with friends and satisfaction with friends is less strong for individuals who use the smartphone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joep.2017.09.001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gergen, K. J. (2003). Self and community in the new floating worlds. In: K. Nyiri (Ed.), Mobile democracy, essays on society, self and politics (pp. 103–114). Passagen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rotondi, V., Stanca, L., & Tomasuolo, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Stanca, Luca
Venue
Journal of Economic Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
63
Pages
17-26
ISSN
0167-4870 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2588103048
Cited by
251
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
56.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council (694262)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (694262)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
smartphone use, social interaction quality, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, face-to-face interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review