Cited by 45Reproductive Health and TechnologiesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumStress Responses and Cortisol

Infertility Stress, Cortisol, Coping, and Quality of Life in U.S. Women Who Undergo Infertility Treatments

Swift, Alison, Reis, Pamela, Swanson, Melvin·2021·Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Abstract

Objective To examine relationships between infertility-related stress (IRS), coping, and quality of life (QOL) in U.S. women who undergo infertility treatments and to examine relationships among hair cortisol, IRS, coping, and QOL in a small subsample.Design Descriptive correlational cross-sectional survey.Setting Infertility-related Facebook support groups and Web pages.Participants A total of 230 U.S. women between 18 and 55 years old who underwent infertility treatments. We collected root hair samples for cortisol analysis from a subsample of 37 participants.Methods Participants completed the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility Fertility Problem Stress Scales (Personal, Marital, and Social), Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility Coping Strategies Scales (Active-Avoidance, Passive-Avoidance, Active-Confronting, and Meaning-Based), Fertility Quality of Life scales (Emotional, Mind/Body, Relational, Social, and total QOL), and a demographic and supplemental infertility questionnaire. We used descriptive statistics, correlation, and hierarchic regression for data analysis. We mailed subsample participants instructions and materials to supply a 3-cm hair sample for cortisol analysis by an independent laboratory and a stamped envelope to return the materials.Results Higher stress scores were associated with more active-avoidance coping, less meaning-based coping, and lower QOL. Coping explained 40% of the variance in QOL. After controlling for coping strategies, stress explained another 20% of the variance in QOL. Hair cortisol levels for most participants were low and negatively correlated to stress, especially marital stress, and positively correlated to QOL.Conclusion Women with infertility with high levels of IRS tended to use active-avoidance coping and had lower QOL. Hypocortisolism was prevalent in the subsample and warrants further exploration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.12.004

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swift, A., Reis, P., & Swanson, M.
Corresponding author
Swift, Alison
Venue
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
275-288
ISSN
  • 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
  • 0884-2175
OpenAlex
W3122316708
Cited by
45
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
infertility-related stress, infertility treatment, coping strategies, quality of life, hair cortisol, adrenal insufficiency, meaning-based coping, marital stress, psychosocial stress, women
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Infertility, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review