Cited by 175Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Assessing cortisol from hair samples in a large observational cohort: the Whitehall II study

Open access
Abell, Jessica G., Stalder, Tobias, Ferrie, Jane E., Shipley, Martin J., Kirschbaum, Clemens, Kivimäki, Mika, Kumari, Meena·2016·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Hair cortisol concentrations (HCC) have been suggested to reflect long-term integrated cortisol levels, but most evidence of associations with co-variates is from small samples of healthy volunteers. The objective of this study was to describe the collection of hair samples in a large cohort study and report associations of demographic and health measures with HCC. We examined HCC measured from the 3cm hair segment near the scalp in 3507 participants (aged 59-83y) from The Whitehall II occupational cohort study of British civil servants. Hair samples were analysed using a column switching LC-APCI-MS/MS assay. Findings from mutually adjusted linear regression analyses revealed lower HCC in participants who reported use of hair dye [% difference (95%CI); -12.5 (-22.0, -1.9), p value=0.022] and evidence suggestive of differences by length of sample storage and seasonal variation. With regard to demographic variables, HCC was lower in women compared to men [-17.0 (-24.8, -8.4), p value <0.001] and higher in Black compared to other ethnic groups. Prevalent diabetes, use of systemic corticosteroids and cardiovascular medication were independently associated with higher HCC. With regard to health, depressive symptoms were associated with higher HCC [20.0 (8.1, 33.3), p value=0.001] following adjustment for physical disease and medication. We conclude that hair steroid analysis presents significant opportunities for assessing cortisol in large scale cohorts. Demographic factors, sample storage, season of collection and hair characteristics should be considered in future analyses. Health status, both mental and physical, is linked to HCC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.07.214

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some cross-sectional studies have shown positive associations between hair cortisol and clinically diagnosed depressed patients (mostly inpatients) and between hair cortisol and self-reported depressive symptoms in non-clinical community samples.

    “Some cross-sectional studies have also shown positive associations between hair cortisol and clinically diagnosed depressed patients (mostly inpatients; Dettenborn et al., 2012) as well as between hair cortisol and self-reported depressive symptoms in non-clinical community samples (Abell et al., 2016; Faresjo et al., 2013; Stalder et al., 2014; Wikenius et al., 2016).”
  • Existing literature does not clearly demonstrate season effects that could explain the early rise in hair cortisol seen here.

    “However, existing literature does not clearly demonstrate season effects that could explain the early rise in hair cortisol seen here.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. WHO Abbreviated Report of a WHO Consultation Use of Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus 2011 World Health Organization 26158184

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abell, J. G., Stalder, T., Ferrie, J. E., Shipley, M. J., Kirschbaum, C., Kivimäki, M., & Kumari, M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Abell, Jessica G.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
73
Pages
148-156
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2492736526
Cited by
175
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (K013351)
  • National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (R01HL36310)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG13196, R01AG34454)
  • Agency for Health Care Policy Research (HS06516)
  • Dunhill Medical Trust (R247/0512)
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-596-28-0001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
hair cortisol, hair dyes, sample storage time, seasonal variation, sex differences, ethnic differences, diabetes mellitus, systemic corticosteroids, cardiovascular drugs, depressive symptoms, chronic stress biomarkers, Whitehall II cohort, public sector employees
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, United Kingdom, Hair, Health Status, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review