The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction
Abstract
Research on supplier satisfaction in buyer–supplier relationships has been primarily conceptual. One purpose of the research described in this paper is to empirically test the influences of supply chain power on supplier satisfaction. Exploration of the effects of power on factors of supplier satisfaction will provide the key to understanding the power‐satisfaction link in supply chain relationships. This paper shows how the buyer–seller relationship affects supplier satisfaction. In doing so, previous satisfaction and power literature is pulled together to demonstrate that the power‐satisfaction variable must be included in any examination of supply chain partnerships. The three primary objectives of this research are to establish how the different “bases of power” affect the satisfaction of selling firms, investigate how power driven relationships affect supplier satisfaction, and measure the effect of power influences on supplier satisfaction in the automobile industry. Each of these research objectives was achieved. This study establishes the first empirical evidence for the measurement of power‐driven supplier satisfaction. In each of the nine models studied, the power‐affected buyer–supplier relationship was found to have a significant positive effect on both performance and satisfaction. The paths between performance and satisfaction, however, were consistently found to be non‐significant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Ganesan, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800201 · Cited by 6,741
Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective
Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400306 · Cited by 4,763
The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms
Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.12.2.125 · Cited by 4,610
Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns.
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265 · Cited by 2,880
Cited by
The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆
Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001 · Cited by 1,018
Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001 · Cited by 539
Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains
Crook, T. R., & Combs, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.008 · Cited by 533
Power Asymmetry, Adaptation and Collaboration in Dyadic Relationships Involving a Powerful Partner
Nyaga, G. N., Lynch, D. F., Marshall, D., & Ambrose, E. (2013) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12011 · Cited by 342
Integrating the Supply Chain … 25 years on
Stevens, G. C., & Johnson, M. (2016) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-07-2015-0175 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Benton, W. C., & Maloni, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2169751289
- Cited by
- 873
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 33.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.002
- The paper
- Benton, W. C., & Maloni, M. (2005). The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.