The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On characterizing the 4 C's in supply chain management
Abstract
Supply chain management is a field at the confluence of many other disciplines; it has been studied under a number of perspectives, which has played a role for the crossbreeding of the discipline. In this paper, we propose a typology of supply chain configurations that contributes to tie together terms that have been used disjointedly for describing various forms of supply chain. It also enables researchers to develop theories related to the identified typology, rather than continue expanding efforts on separate, unconnected studies. The typology is configurational, consistent, and based on the correspondence (Sheppard and Sherman, 1998) between Fiske's theory of relational forms (1990) and the concept of interdependence, analyzed in the context of supply chain management. Our framework encompasses four main configurations – the communicative, coordinated, collaborative, and co‐opetitive – and we refer to these as the 4 C's in supply chain management. We discuss the benefits of the proposed typology from managerial and research perspectives, and suggest some research extensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.
Fiske, A. P. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.4.689 · Cited by 2,510
Stevens, G. C. (1989) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management · doi:10.1108/eum0000000000329 · Cited by 1,560
Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms
Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600201 · Cited by 1,337
Cited by
Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance
Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008 · Cited by 2,049
Defining Supply Chain Management: In the Past, Present, and Future
Min, S., Zacharia, Z. G., & Smith, C. D. (2019) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12201 · Cited by 357
Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M., & Anex, R. P. (2009) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.580 · Cited by 276
Lim, S. F. W. T., & Srai, J. S. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2016-0733 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Lejeune, M. A., & Yakova, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-100
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W1983314538
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On characterizing the 4 C's in supply chain management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.004
- The paper
- Lejeune, M. A., & Yakova, N. (2005). On characterizing the 4 C's in supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.