The role of ChatGPT in perianesthesia Nursing
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ChatGPT has kept nurses abreast of the most recent research and helped them obtain immediate and individualized responses to various healthcare inquiries.
“Similarly, Odom-Forren (2023) noted that it has kept nurses abreast of the most recent research and helped them obtain immediate and individualized responses to various healthcare inquiries.”
From Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: a rapid review (2024) · cites this paper as Odom-Forren, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use
(2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Flanagin, A., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Berkwits, M., & Christiansen, S. L. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Gilson, A., Safranek, C., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R. A., & Chartash, D. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.23.22283901 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Zielinski, C., Winker, M. A., Aggarwal, R., Ferris, L. E., Heinemann, M., Lapeña, J. F. F., Pai, S. A., Ing, E. B., Citrome, L., Alam, M., et al. (2023) · Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.32412/pjohns.v38i1.2135 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sohail, S. S., Farhat, F., Himeur, Y., Nadeem, M., Madsen, D. Ø., Singh, Y., Atalla, S., & Mansoor, W. (2023) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101675 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Gunawan, J., Aungsuroch, Y., & Montayre, J. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106323 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
A rapid review on current and potential uses of large language models in nursing
Hobensack, M., von Gerich, H., Vyas, P., Withall, J., Peltonen, L.-M., Block, L. J., Davies, S., Chan, R., Van Bulck, L., Cho, H., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104753 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: a rapid review
Kleib, M., Darko, E. M., Akingbade, O., Kennedy, M., Majekodunmi, P., Nickel, E., & Vogelsang, L. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100252 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Odom-Forren, J.
- ORCID
- Odom-Forren, Jan
- Venue
- Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 176-177
- ISSN
- 1089-9472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4360602960
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, perianesthesia nursing, artificial intelligence, large language models, post-anesthesia care, patient care, nursing technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
