Cited by 229Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

United States national pain strategy for population research: concepts, definitions, and pilot data.

Open access
Von Korff, Michael, Scher, Ann I., Helmick, Charles, Carter-Pokras, Olivia, Dodick, David W., Goulet, Joseph, Hamill-Ruth, Robin, LeResche, Linda +5 more·2016·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled National Pain Strategy population research objectives include: estimating chronic pain prevalence, studying pain treatment with electronic health care data, and developing metrics to assess progress in reducing chronic pain impact. In this article, the National Pain Strategy Population Research Workgroup reviews concepts relevant to achieving these aims. High-impact chronic pain was defined as persistent pain with substantial restriction of life activities lasting 6 months or more. In pilot work, we tested a brief assessment of high-impact chronic pain, and used electronic health records data to describe pain-related health care. A mail survey of adult health plan enrollees (N = 770) reported that 14% had high-impact chronic pain. Relative to persons with lower-impact chronic pain, those with high-impact chronic pain were more often frequent users of health care for pain, reported lower quality of life, greater pain-related interference with activities, and more often reported pain at multiple anatomic locations. Analyses of health care data (N = 289,464) reported that pain patients had higher health care costs compared with others and that pain services were typically delivered in primary care. These results support the feasibility of developing data on chronic pain through national health interview surveys and large electronic health care databases.Perspective Pilot analyses supported the feasibility of brief chronic pain assessments suitable for national health surveys and use of electronic health care databases to develop data regarding trends in the delivery of pain treatments, costs, and effectiveness. These methods are relevant to achieving the aims of the US National Pain Strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.009

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The estimate of high-impact chronic pain in this study is similar to or slightly lower than estimates reported in the few studies that have looked at pain using a similar construct.

    “This estimate of high-impact chronic pain is similar to or slightly lower than estimates reported in the few studies that have looked at pain using a similar construct.”
  • The HICP prevalence estimate is considerably lower than estimates based on pain interference.

    “That this estimate is considerably lower than estimates based on pain interference11,36 is not unexpected.”
  • Definitions based solely on pain duration do not consider the multidimensional nature of chronic pain, namely activity limitations and participation restrictions.

    “Although conceptually appealing, this hotly debated7 approach does not consider the multidimensional nature of chronic pain, namely, the presence of activity limitations and participation restrictions,5,17,30–36 classifications recognized by the World Health Organization.37”
  • The U.S. National Pain Strategy proposed the concept of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) to better identify those with significant levels of life interference.

    “To address this shortcoming, the U.S. National Pain Strategy proposed the concept of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) to better identify those with significant levels of life interference (ie, work, social, and/or self-care activities).24,36”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Crombie IK, Croft PR, Linton SJ, LeResche L, Von Korff M (eds): Epidemiology of Pain. Seattle, WA, IASP Press, 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Von Korff, M., Scher, A. I., Helmick, C., Carter-Pokras, O., Dodick, D. W., Goulet, J., Hamill-Ruth, R., LeResche, L., Porter, L., Tait, R., Terman, G., Veasley, C., & Mackey, S.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1068-1080
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2464049161
Cited by
229
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NINDS
  • NIH Inter-Agency Pain Research Coordinating Committee (AG034181)
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Healthlogix
  • Haymarket Media Group, Ltd.
  • SAGE Publishing
  • Synergy
  • Allergan
  • Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  • Oxford University Press
  • Cambridge University Press
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, high-impact chronic pain, health care costs, electronic health records, pain assessment tools, quality of life, primary care, health plan enrollees
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Terminology as Topic, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, United States, Prevalence, Databases, Factual, Health Care Costs, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review