Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Culture and Palliative Care: Preferences, Communication, Meaning, and Mutual Decision Making

Open access
Cain, Cindy L., Surbone, Antonella, Elk, Ronit, Kagawa-Singer, Marjorie·2018·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.007

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Cain, C. L., Surbone, A., Elk, R., & Kagawa-Singer, M.
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
1408-1419
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.007
OpenAlex
W2785127689
Cited by
357
References
82
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture and Palliative Care: Preferences, Communication, Meaning, and Mutual Decision Making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.007
The paper
Cain, C. L., Surbone, A., Elk, R., & Kagawa-Singer, M. (2018). Culture and Palliative Care: Preferences, Communication, Meaning, and Mutual Decision Making. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.