Cited by 84Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Psychological Interventions for Children with Functional Somatic Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Bonvanie, Irma J., Kallesøe, Karen H., Janssens, Karin A.M., Schröder, Andreas, Rosmalen, Judith G.M., Rask, Charlotte U.·2017·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effectiveness of psychological treatments on symptom load and associated disability in children with functional somatic symptoms, and to explore potential moderators of effects.Study design Cochrane, PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched for randomized controlled trials published in peer-reviewed journals. Randomized controlled trials studying the effect of a psychological treatment on symptom load and disability in children with functional somatic symptoms were selected. Data on symptom load, disability, and school absence directly post-treatment and at follow-up were extracted by 2 assessors. Studies were appraised with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Standardized mean differences were pooled in a random-effects model. Heterogeneity in effect-sizes was explored by use of meta-regressions. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42015029667.Results Out of 4098 identified records, 27 studies were included in this review of which 21 were included in meta-analyses. Psychological treatments reduced symptom load (Hedges g = -0.61), disability (Hedges g = -0.42), and school absence (Hedges g = -0.51) post-treatment in children suffering from various functional somatic symptoms. Effects were maintained at follow-up. Type and duration of symptoms, age, and treatment dose did not explain heterogeneity in effect-sizes between studies. Effect-sizes should be interpreted with caution because of the variety in outcome measures, unexplained heterogeneity in found effects and potential publication bias.Conclusions Psychological interventions reduce symptom load, disability, and school absence in children with functional somatic symptoms. Future research should clarify which patient and treatment characteristics modify outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.03.017

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has so far focused on treatment of single syndrome FSS based on sub-specialties in the paediatric setting.

    “research has so far focused on treatment of single syndrome FSS based on sub-specialties in the paediatric setting [24].”

    From Feasibility of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for adolescents (AHEAD) with multiple functional somatic syndromes: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Study Characteristics section reports that 24 of the 27 pediatric treatment studies focused on a specific symptom category or syndrome, supporting the claim that research has largely been syndrome-specific. The Treatments and Controls section says most treatments were delivered in specialized clinics, but it does not establish that the research was organized around pediatric subspecialties. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Further research on generic treatment options has been suggested to diminish the risk of fragmented care in specialized clinics.

    “Further research on generic treatment options has been suggested to diminish the risk of fragmented care in specialized clinics [24, 43–45].”

    From Feasibility of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for adolescents (AHEAD) with multiple functional somatic syndromes: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Discussion (page not available in our copy) calls for further research on treatment delivery and implementation, including collaboration between specialized centers. It does not recommend generic treatment options or say they would reduce fragmented care. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The majority of studies of CBT for functional somatic syndromes in children and adolescents are quite small and heterogeneous with regard to inclusion criteria, setting, dose and type of delivered treatment and therapist experience.

    “However, the results should be interpreted with caution as the majority of these studies are quite small and heterogeneous with regard to e.g. inclusion criteria, setting, dose and type of delivered treatment and therapist experience (Abbott et al., 2018; Bonvanie et al., 2017).”

    From Third wave treatments for functional somatic syndromes and health anxiety across the age span: A narrative review (2019) · cites this paper as Bonvanie et al., 2017

    The Discussion says studies differed considerably in inclusion criteria, treatment type, setting, dose, and therapist experience. Study Characteristics reports 24–273 randomized participants per study, but our copy does not establish that a majority were quite small; it also covers psychological interventions more broadly, not only CBT. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across age groups, patient-activating therapies are the most promising treatments, and CBT has so far been the most prevailing in intervention studies.

    “Across age groups, patient-activating therapies are the most promising treatments, and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has so far been the most prevailing in intervention studies (Abbott et al., 2018; Bonvanie et al., 2017; Henningsen et al., 2018).”

    From Third wave treatments for functional somatic syndromes and health anxiety across the age span: A narrative review (2019) · cites this paper as Bonvanie et al., 2017

    The Treatments and Controls section reports that 15 of 27 included studies investigated CBT-based treatments, supporting CBT as the most prevalent approach in this review. The Discussion reports benefits from psychological treatments in children and adolescents, but does not identify patient-activating therapies as the most promising treatments across age groups; the review is limited to children and adolescents. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Overall, the effect sizes for CBT in children and adolescents with functional somatic syndromes are somewhat larger than the corresponding estimates in adult studies.

    “Overall, the ES are found to be somewhat larger than the corresponding estimates in adult studies (Bonvanie et al., 2017).”

    From Third wave treatments for functional somatic syndromes and health anxiety across the age span: A narrative review (2019) · cites this paper as Bonvanie et al., 2017

    The Abstract reports effect sizes for psychological treatments in children with functional somatic symptoms, and the Treatments and Controls section says 15 studies examined CBT-based treatments. Our copy does not compare those effect sizes with estimates from adult studies, so it does not support the claim that they are somewhat larger. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schroder A, Sharpe M, Fink P. Medically unexplained symptom man- agement. Lancet Psychiatry 2015;2:587-8.
  2. Rutten JMTM, Korterink JJ, Venmans LMAJ, Benninga MA, Tabbers MM. Nonpharmacologic treatment of functional abdominal pain disorders: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2015;135:522-35.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonvanie, I. J., Kallesøe, K. H., Janssens, K. A. M., Schröder, A., Rosmalen, J. G. M., & Rask, C. U.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Bonvanie, Irma J.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
187
Pages
272-281.e17
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606343223
Cited by
84
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
functional somatic symptoms, psychological intervention, children, symptom burden, disability, school absenteeism, treatment effectiveness, treatment moderators
MeSH terms
Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review