Cited by 206Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Chronic idiopathic pain in adolescence—High prevalence and disability: The young hunt study 2008

Hoftun, Gry Børmark, Romundstad, Pål Richard, Zwart, John-Anker, Rygg, Marite·2011·Pain

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of self-reported chronic idiopathic pain among adolescents in relation to age and gender, and to explore how pain interferes with daily activities. The study was performed in Nord-Trøndelag County, Norway in 2006-2008. All adolescents were invited to participate; the response rate was 78%. Participants completed a comprehensive questionnaire, including questions about pain and interference with everyday life. Chronic idiopathic pain was defined as pain at least once a week during the last 3 months, not related to any known disease or injury. The final study population, with complete pain questionnaires, consisted of 7373 adolescents aged 13-18 years. Chronic pain was reported by 44.4% of the participants, and 25.5% reported pain in at least 2 locations. Chronic idiopathic musculoskeletal pain was most prevalent (33.4%), and the neck/shoulder was most commonly affected. Musculoskeletal pain in 3 or more locations was reported by 8.5%. Pain almost daily was reported by 10.2%. More girls than boys reported pain. In girls, the prevalence of pain increased with age. A high number of pain-associated disabilities were reported, and 58.5% described difficulties doing daily activities in leisure time. Subjective disabilities were higher in girls, and increased with the frequency of pain and the number of pain locations, as shown by high disability in adolescents with musculoskeletal pain in 3 or more locations. Chronic idiopathic pain, especially multisite pain, is common among adolescents, and those suffering from it report a major impact on several areas of daily living.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2011.05.007

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoftun, G. B., Romundstad, P. R., Zwart, J.-A., & Rygg, M.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Hoftun, Gry Børmark
Venue
Pain
Published
2011-10
Volume
152
Issue
10
Pages
2259-2266
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038443043
Cited by
206
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norwegian Women’s Public Health Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
adolescents, prevalence, disability, musculoskeletal pain, multisite pain, neck and shoulder pain, sex differences, age differences, interference with daily activities, HUNT study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Back Pain, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Prevalence, Neck Pain, Shoulder Pain, Young Adult, Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review