Cited by 10Gastrointestinal motility and disordersCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

Utility of Diagnostic Studies for Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Children with Orthostatic Intolerance

Zhang, Lana N., Moak, Jeffrey P., Desbiens, John, Hanumanthaiah, Sridhar, Fabian, Robin R., Clarke, Lindsay, Sahay, Rashmi D., Darbari, Anil·2019·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To assess the utility of gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies in the evaluation of patients with orthostatic intolerance.Study design Medical records of 103 consecutive children/young adults with orthostatic intolerance and gastrointestinal symptoms were reviewed. All patients had undergone antroduodenal manometry in conjunction with the tilt table test, autonomic testing, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD). A gastric emptying study (GES) was performed in 81 patients.Results The median age of the cohort was 17 years (IQR, 15-19) with a female predominance (females:males, 3:1). As expected, the tilt table test was abnormal in all patients. Antroduodenal manometry was abnormal in 83 of 103 patients (81%), showing neurogenic intestinal dysmotility in 50%, rumination in 20%, and visceral hyperalgesia in 10%. The GES results were abnormal in 23 of 81 patients (28.4%), mostly (21 of 23) with delayed GES. None of the tilt table test or autonomic results were predictive of abnormal antroduodenal manometry or GES. Analysis of EGD biopsy samples revealed nonspecific esophagitis and/or gastritis in 16 of 103 patients (15%).Conclusions Antroduodenal manometry with the tilt table test were the most insightful investigations in adolescents and young adults with orthostatic intolerance and gastrointestinal symptoms. GES and EGD provided limited information. Gastrointestinal symptoms were related more to functional rather than mucosal or organic etiologies, suggesting a limited role of endoscopy alone in evaluating patients with orthostatic intolerance presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.048

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, L. N., Moak, J. P., Desbiens, J., Hanumanthaiah, S., Fabian, R. R., Clarke, L., Sahay, R. D., & Darbari, A.
Affiliations
  • Children's National (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Darbari, Anil
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
205
Pages
138-144
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898170502
Cited by
10
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
orthostatic intolerance, gastrointestinal symptoms, antroduodenal manometry, tilt table test, gastric emptying study, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, rumination, visceral hypersensitivity, delayed gastric emptying, esophagitis, gastritis, functional gastrointestinal disorders, adolescents and young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Biopsy, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Male, Manometry, Retrospective Studies, Endoscopy, Digestive System, Tilt-Table Test, Orthostatic Intolerance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review