Cited by 34Bacterial Infections and VaccinesBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingAntibiotic Use and Resistance

Clinical and Financial Impact of a Diagnostic Stewardship Program for Children with Suspected Central Nervous System Infection

Open access
Messacar, Kevin, Palmer, Claire, Gregoire, LiseAnne, Elliott, Audrey, Ackley, Elizabeth, Perraillon, Marcelo C., Tyler, Kenneth L., Dominguez, Samuel R.·2022·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To investigate the optimal implementation and clinical and financial impacts of the FilmArray Meningitis Encephalitis Panel (MEP) multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in children with suspected central nervous system infection. Study design A pre-post quasiexperimental cohort study to investigate the impact of implementing MEP using a rapid CSF diagnostic stewardship program was conducted at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO). MEP was implemented with electronic medical record indication selection to guide testing to children meeting approved use criteria: infants <2 months, immunocompromised, encephalitis, and ≥5 white blood cells/μL of CSF. Positive results were communicated with antimicrobial stewardship real-time decision support. All cases with CSF obtained by lumbar puncture sent to the CHCO microbiology laboratory meeting any of the 4 aforementioned criteria were included with preimplementation controls (2015-2016) compared with postimplementation cases (2017-2018). Primary outcome was time-to-optimal antimicrobials compared using log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results Time-to-optimal antimicrobials decreased from 28 hours among 1124 preimplementation controls to 18 hours (P < .0001) among 1127 postimplementation cases (72% with MEP testing conducted). Postimplementation, time-to-positive CSF results was faster (4.8 vs 9.6 hours, P < .0001), intravenous antimicrobial duration was shorter (24 vs 36 hours, P = .004), with infectious neurologic diagnoses more frequently identified (15% vs 10%, P = .03). There were no differences in time-to-effective antimicrobials, hospital admissions, antimicrobial starts, or length of stay. Costs of microbiologic testing increased, but total hospital costs were unchanged. Conclusions Implementation of MEP with a rapid central nervous system diagnostic stewardship program improved antimicrobial use with faster results shortening empiric therapy. Routine MEP testing for high-yield indications enables antimicrobial optimization with unchanged overall costs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.002

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are reports of clearly positive impacts of panel assays for meningitis and/or encephalitis diagnostics, including reducing the time to diagnosis and shortening empirical antibiotic use.

    “There are reports of clearly positive impacts of the use of panel assays for meningitis and/or encephalitis diagnostics, for instance, in reducing the time to diagnosis and shortening empirical antibiotic use (14, 15).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]American Academy of Pediatrics CoID. Red Book: 2021–2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases 32nd Edition. DW Kimberlin, editor. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Messacar, K., Palmer, C., Gregoire, L., Elliott, A., Ackley, E., Perraillon, M. C., Tyler, K. L., & Dominguez, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Colorado School of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Messacar, Kevin
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
244
Pages
161-168.e1
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211009631
Cited by
34
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (UL1 TR002535)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NIAID DMID (K23AI28069)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel, multiplex PCR, cerebrospinal fluid, central nervous system infection, encephalitis, meningitis, antimicrobial stewardship, diagnostic stewardship, empiric antimicrobial therapy, antimicrobial duration, hospital costs, pediatric infection
MeSH terms
Anti-Infective Agents, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Central Nervous System Infections, Child, Encephalitis, Humans, Infant, Meningitis, Nervous System Malformations, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review