The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological momentary assessment in aging research: A critical review
Open accessAbstract
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) gathers respondent data on affective, behavioral, and contextual experiences as close in time to those experiences as possible. Potential advantages of EMA in aging research include reducing memory biases and gathering intra-individual data, yet there is little understanding about implementation. The goal of this critical review was to assess the feasibility and applications of EMA in psychological and behavioral research on aging. Through a comprehensive search of the online electronic databases, Psycinfo and Pubmed, for English-language peer-reviewed journals published between 1990 and 2007, we identified 40 articles using EMA methods in older adults. Studies sampled participants between five times per day over one day to once a week for 210 days. Samples were generally not cognitively impaired, evenly split between healthy and clinical populations, and only 6 of 40 studies focused on psychiatric diagnoses. The most common assessment content solicited ratings on affect (n=15), activities of daily living (n=12), physical activities (n=10), and social exchanges (n=8). A total of 90% of the studies that reported compliance reported rates over 80%. Uses of EMA varied widely, with research goals including validation of global measures, detection of subtle treatment effects, and for testing hypotheses about causal intra-individual relationships. Although these measures appear feasible and useful in aging research, recommendations for future studies include adapting measures to enable data collection among older participants with cognitive impairments and/or psychopathology, along with greater use of electronic data capture to improve compliance and increase ease of implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This approach has many advantages87 over “one-time, in-clinic” measures, including the generation of more stable estimates of neurobehavioural symptoms for outcomes research;88 the assessment of dynamic changes among theoretically linked constructs;89 the reduction of recall bias for patients with neurobehavioural disorders;90,91 and the ability to model causal intra-individual relationships.92”
From Precision clinical trials: a framework for getting to precision medicine for neurobehavioural disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030 · Cited by 3,843
Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span.
Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.644 · Cited by 1,558
Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology.
(1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-817_6 · Cited by 1,056
Patient non-compliance with paper diaries
Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Hufford, M. R. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1193 · Cited by 810
Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology
Kerins, G. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.22.2760 · Cited by 594
Comparison of the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire with a 7-day diary and pedometer
Stel, V. S., Smit, J. H., Pluijm, S. M. F., Visser, M., Deeg, D. J. H., & Lips, P. T. A. M. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.008 · Cited by 547
Moskowitz, D. S., & Young, S. N. (2006) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1139/jpn.0602 · Cited by 457
Methods of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Organizational Research
Beal, D. J., & Weiss, H. M. (2003) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428103257361 · Cited by 400
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0017915 · Cited by 435
Short, C. E., DeSmet, A., Woods, C., Williams, S. L., Maher, C., Middelweerd, A., Müller, A. M., Wark, P. A., Vandelanotte, C., Poppe, L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9397 · Cited by 400
Wen, C. K. F., Schneider, S., Stone, A. A., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6641 · Cited by 350
Moore, R. C., Depp, C. A., Wetherell, J. L., & Lenze, E. J. (2016) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.01.011 · Cited by 274
Self-citationEcological momentary assessment methodology in chronic pain research: a systematic review
May, M., Junghaenel, D. U., Ono, M., Stone, A. A., & Schneider, S. (2018) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.01.006 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Cain, A. E., Depp, C. A., & Jeste, D. V.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Depp, Colin A.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 987-996
- ISSN
- 0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3638997
- OpenAlex
- W2124881052
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH091260, K23MH077225, P30MH066248)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Keywords
- ecological momentary assessment, aging research, older adults, memory bias, within-person variability, affect, activities of daily living, physical activity, social exchange, cognitive impairment, psychopathology, electronic data capture, treatment effect detection
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aging, Compliance, Ecology, Humans, Research, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Geriatric Assessment, Databases, Bibliographic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
