Cited by 457Mental Health Research TopicsMental Health via WritingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Ecological momentary assessment: what it is and why it is a method of the future in clinical psychopharmacology

Open access
Moskowitz, Debbie S., Young, Simon N.·2006·Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience

Abstract

Current methods of assessment in clinical psychopharmacology have several serious disadvantages, particularly for the study of social functioning. We aimed to review the strengths and weaknesses of current methods used in clinical psychopharmacology and to compare them with a group of methods, developed by personality/social psychologists, termed ecological momentary assessment (EMA), which permit the research participant to report on symptoms, affect and behaviour close in time to experience and which sample many events or time periods. EMA has a number of advantages over more traditional methods for the assessment of patients in clinical psychopharmacological studies. It can both complement and, in part, replace existing methods. EMA methods will permit more sensitive assessments and will enable more wide-ranging and detailed measurements of mood and behaviour. These types of methods should be adopted more widely by clinical psychopharmacology researchers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/jpn.0602

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moskowitz, D. S., & Young, S. N.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Published
2006-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
13-20
ISSN
  • 1180-4882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2434
OpenAlex
W2188070812
Cited by
457
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, clinical psychopharmacology, social functioning, mood measurement, affective states, behaviour measurement, assessment methods, longitudinal data collection
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Data Collection, Forecasting, Humans, Psychopharmacology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review