Cited by 35Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Pain anxiety differentially mediates the association of pain intensity with function depending on level of intolerance of uncertainty

Fischerauer, Stefan F., Talaei-Khoei, Mojtaba, Vissers, Frederique L., Chen, Neal, Vranceanu, Ana-Maria·2018·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Uncertainty about symptom duration, cause, prognosis and treatment is common in patients who seek medical care, yet individual ability to manage this uncertainty varies. Intolerance of uncertainty is considered an important factor in the etiology and persistence of negative emotions- in particular, depression and anxiety. We explored the contribution of intolerance of uncertainty to anxiety due to pain and physical function in patients seeking care at an orthopedic medical practice. Participants (N = 105, mean age of 51 ± 17, 63% male) were administered PROMIS Physical Function v1.2 Upper Extremity CAT, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-short form (PASS-20), and the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-short version (IUS-12). Results showed that the mediating role of pain anxiety is contingent upon the level of intolerance of uncertainty. Specifically, a minimum level of intolerance of uncertainty is required for the development of pain anxiety and its effect on function, and as intolerance of uncertainty rises from low to medium to high levels, the effect of pain on function goes from being independent of the anxiety to being more and more carried by and through anxiety about pain. These findings support the contention that intolerance of uncertainty plays a crucial role in the relationship between pain, pain anxiety, and physical function. Intolerance of uncertainty appears to be a trans-diagnostic target for coping skills training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.11.006

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischerauer, S. F., Talaei-Khoei, M., Vissers, F. L., Chen, N., & Vranceanu, A.-M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Vranceanu, Ana-Maria
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
97
Pages
30-37
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767235681
Cited by
35
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, pain-related anxiety, pain intensity, physical function, mediation, orthopedic patients, upper limb function, coping skills training
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Uncertainty, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review