Cited by 99Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsMental Health Research Topics

Intolerance of uncertainty and negative metacognitive beliefs as transdiagnostic mediators of repetitive negative thinking in a clinical sample with anxiety disorders

Open access
McEvoy, Peter M., Mahoney, Alison E.J.·2013·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

This study aimed to replicate and extend a hierarchical model of vulnerability to worry, with neuroticism and extraversion as higher-order factors and negative metacognitions and intolerance of uncertainty as second-order factors. The model also included a transdiagnostic measure of repetitive negative thinking (RNT) and depression symptoms as outcome variables to determine whether relationships would extend beyond worry, which has traditionally been studied within the context of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Participants (N=99) were referrals to a specialist anxiety disorders clinic with a principal anxiety disorder who completed a battery of self-report questionnaires assessing neuroticism, extraversion, metacognitions, intolerance of uncertainty, worry, RNT, and depression symptoms. Mediational analyses using bootstrapping provided support for transdiagnostic and diagnosis-specific mediation effects. Negative metacognitions fully mediated the relationship between neuroticism and RNT for the whole sample and for subsamples with and without GAD. Intolerance of uncertainty mediated the relationship between neuroticism and worry (for the whole sample and for those with GAD) and between neuroticism and RNT (for those with GAD). Implications for theory, treatment, and nosology are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.01.006

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy group has played a role in increasing distress tolerance.

    “During research, McEvoy and Mahoney [9] found that the cognitive-behavioral therapy group has played a role in increasing distress tolerance.”

    From Comparing the Effects of Islamic Spiritual Therapy and Stress Inoculation Training on Distress Tolerance and Anxiety of Patients With Stomach Cancer. (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction reports that changes in intolerance of uncertainty were associated with improvements in worry and anxiety during CBT, citing intervention trials. But McEvoy and Mahoney’s own Procedure describes questionnaires completed at an initial assessment, not a CBT group intervention, and the paper does not report that a group increased distress tolerance. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our finding that changes in IU explained unique variance in RNT in all three groups, and symptoms in the social anxiety and worry/rumination groups, is consistent with previous studies.

    “Our finding that changes in IU explained unique variance in RNT in all three groups, and symptoms in the social anxiety and worry and rumination groups, is consistent with previous studies (McEvoy & Mahoney, 2013;Sexton et al., 2003).”

    From The search for universal transdiagnostic and trans-therapy change processes: Evidence for intolerance of uncertainty (2016) · cites this paper as McEvoy & Mahoney, 2013

    The Discussion (section 4.0; page unavailable) reports that IU mediated repetitive negative thinking and worry for patients with GAD, supporting a broad connection between IU and these outcomes. It also says IU did not mediate those outcomes for patients without GAD. The paper therefore supports the citing authors’ claim of consistency only in part: it does not establish a corresponding finding across all three groups or examine changes in IU. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McEvoy, P. M., & Mahoney, A. E. J.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Clinical Interventions (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
McEvoy, Peter M.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
216-224
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974079964
Cited by
99
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, repetitive negative thinking, anxiety disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, neuroticism, extraversion, worry, depressive symptoms, metacognition
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Negativism, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking, Uncertainty, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review