Cited by 7Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Staging of depressive disorders: Relevance of resistance to treatment and residual symptoms

Reneses, Blanca, Aguera-Ortiz, Luis, Sevilla-Llewellyn-Jones, Julia, Carrillo, Antonio, Argudo, Isabel, Regatero, María Jose, López-Micó, Cristina, Fuentes, Manuel +1 more·2020·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Background Clinical staging model for depression helps to better define the clinical situation of patients. The objectives of this study are: to correlate the Hetrick's staging model of depression with the severity of depression, associated disability, and resistance to treatment in the established disease stages and to test the modification introduced by our group consisting in the introduction of a substage for recurrence from a previous episode that was stabilized with a complete remission.Methods A Cross-sectional study with 133 adult subjects having a current and primary diagnosis of Depressive disorder was developed. Patients were classified according to the model and assessed with: 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), Clinical Global Impression (CGI); Global Assessment of Function (GAF); Maudsley Staging Method for treatment resistance (MSM) and Sheeham Disability Schedule (SDS).Results The variable that best contributes to the differentiation between clinical stages, in established Depression, is resistance to treatment evaluated by the MSM. Correlations between MSM and the clinical stages were statistically significant between most pairs of stages. Finally, we showed preliminary data in order to prove that a differential sub-stage for recurrent depression with and without inter-episodic remission in the current heuristic models could be a possible stage for better define depression staging model.Conclusions Resistance to treatment should be included in the definition of clinical stages in established depression. Despite the difficulty of establishing a valid model for the staging of depression, it can certainly add great value to diagnosis, therapeutic interventions and clinical research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.07.022

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The clinical staging model for psychosis is the most established, but similar models also emerged for bipolar, depressive and anxiety disorders.

    “The clinical staging model for psychosis is the most established 54,55 , but similar models also emerged for bipolar 56-59 , depressive 60,61 and anxiety 62-65 disorders.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reneses, B., Aguera-Ortiz, L., Sevilla-Llewellyn-Jones, J., Carrillo, A., Argudo, I., Regatero, M. J., López-Micó, C., Fuentes, M., & Palomo, T.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
129
Pages
234-240
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044835763
Cited by
7
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depressive disorders, treatment resistance, residual symptoms, recurrent depression, depression severity, disability, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Remission Induction, Treatment Outcome, Homosexuality, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review